19.1546, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Phonetics/Phonology/Psycholing: VanDam: 'Plasti...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1546. Tue May 13 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.1546, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Phonetics/Phonology/Psycholing: VanDam: 'Plasti...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 13-May-2008
From: Mark VanDam < mrk.vandam at gmail.com >
Subject: Plasticity of Phonological Categories

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:29:20
From: Mark VanDam [mrk.vandam at gmail.com]
Subject: Plasticity of Phonological Categories
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-1546.html&submissionid=178281&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: Indiana University 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2007 

Author: Mark VanDam

Dissertation Title: Plasticity of Phonological Categories 

Dissertation URL:  http://www.VanDamMark.com/docs2/VanDam_07_thesis.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
                     Phonetics
                     Phonology
                     Psycholinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Robert F Port
Kenneth de Jong
Tracy Alan Hall
David B Pisoni
Stuart M Davis

Dissertation Abstract:

The traditional model for language assumes a level of competence that
represents words composed of distinctive features that are invariant units
drawn from a small, universally specified set. The present work tests two
of these assumptions, representational invariance and the assumed small set
size of these features. 

This study trained naive listeners on artificially lengthened voice-onset
times in specific target words and tested whether pretraining and
posttraining perceptual boundary locations differed. Results indicate
subjects were successfully trained on the target words, but this effect did
not generalize to other, structurally similar words. In addition, robust
frequency and lexical effects are reported, but do not apparently interact
with training. As predicted, frequency effects suggest subjects preference
for high-frequency words over low-frequency words, but, somewhat
surprisingly, lexical effects suggest a preference for non-words over words. 

Results undermine foundational assumptions of the traditional model,
specifically the assumptions of representational invariance and a small set
size. To account for these results, an exemplar memory model is discussed
in which no principled restrictions are imposed on memory for language. The
exemplar models discussed are able to account for the facts reported here. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1546