19.1547, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Pragmatics/Semantics: Assimakopoulos: 'Logical ...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1547. Tue May 13 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.1547, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Pragmatics/Semantics: Assimakopoulos: 'Logical ...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 13-May-2008
From: Stavros Assimakopoulos < stavros at ling.ed.ac.uk >
Subject: Logical Structure and Relevance

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:37:46
From: Stavros Assimakopoulos [stavros at ling.ed.ac.uk]
Subject: Logical Structure and Relevance
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-1547.html&submissionid=178283&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: University of Edinburgh 
Program: Centre for Cognitive Science 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2008 

Author: Stavros Assimakopoulos

Dissertation Title: Logical Structure and Relevance 

Dissertation URL:  http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~stavros/Stavros%20Assimakopoulos%20-%20Thesis.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
                     Pragmatics
                     Semantics


Dissertation Director(s):
Caroline Heycock
Ronnie Cann

Dissertation Abstract:

This thesis sets out to investigate relevance-theoretic pragmatics and its
contribution to the study of linguistic meaning from a mentalist outlook.
Adopting an internalist perspective with respect to the semantics of
language seems to create serious problems for traditional accounts, which
customarily seek to separate some common core of meaning from
contextualisation. Against this background, it is argued that the ways in
which an individual's mentally represented linguistic meanings are
pervasively affected by his system of beliefs can be realistically
addressed from a cognitive point of view through the implementation of the
proposals of Relevance Theory regarding the inferential processes involved
in the interpretation of utterances. In this setting, linguistic meaning is
always provided through inference against the context of utterance and the
need for a stable semantic content that is identical across individuals
largely evaporates. In pursuit of this argument, the existing account of
context within the relevance-theoretic framework is initially reviewed and
extended. Then, on the basis of current research on the human cognitive
capacity for metarepresentation and joint attention, it is suggested that
it is an innate predisposition which enables us to efficiently align our
contexts in instances of communication. In addition, it is argued that
these highly developed mind-reading abilities are partially responsible for
our natural tendency to develop an understanding of the world which closely
resembles that of our peers; a point further elucidated by reference to
Searle's notion of the Background. Finally, the semantics/pragmatics
distinction is readdressed from a cognitive perspective and a case is made
for the substitution of the externalist theory of semantic content with a
more psychologically plausible contextualist counterpart within Relevance
Theory itself. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1547