20.2050, Qs: Anti-Perfect

[linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG]

LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2050. Wed Jun 03 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.2050, Qs: Anti-Perfect

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 01-Jun-2009
From: Guillermo Soto < gsoto at uchile.cl >
Subject: Anti-Perfect
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:41:58
From: Guillermo Soto [gsoto at uchile.cl]
Subject: Anti-Perfect

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-2050.html&submissionid=219188&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


As it is well known, Perfect aspect typically signals a relationship
between a past situation and the speech situation. According to McCawley
(1971), Comrie (1976), and other authors, there are different types or uses
of Perfect: resultative, continuative, etc. In all these uses, the Perfect
is, in one sense or another, relevant to the speech situation.

Has anybody studied the opposite situation? I mean a grammatical device
that signals that a past situation is not relevant to the speech situation?
I know that simple past in Perfective aspect can be thought to be this
grammatical device, but I'm talking of a grammatical category that not only
presents the past situation ''for its own sake'' (Comrie), but that
positively means that this situation is not relevant to the speech situation.

A grammatical device of this type can be called Anti-Perfect, and can be
categorized as a kind of Perspective Aspect, in the sense of Dik (1997).

I've looked for Anti-Perfect in different data bases, but the results have
been scarce.

I would be very grateful if you could give me some advice on this topic.
I'm looking specially for papers or books on Anti-Perfect or related terms.

I'll post a summary if there are enough responses.

Thank you in advance


Guillermo Soto
Universidad de Chile
gsoto at uchile.cl 

Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2050