20.1757, Qs: Entailment Portability?

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu May 7 16:38:13 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-1757. Thu May 07 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.1757, Qs: Entailment Portability?

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 02-May-2009
From: Anthony Shore < anthony at OperativeWords.com >
Subject: Entailment Portability?
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:36:55
From: Anthony Shore [anthony at OperativeWords.com]
Subject: Entailment Portability?

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-1757.html&submissionid=216089&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


I am exploring qualities of brand names. Specifically, I am considering the
phenomenon that if a word is adopted as a brand name for one type of
product, that word could be applied to a completely different product and
the same or similar appropriate associations occur. For example, if
''feather'' is a brand name of wi-fi service, the service will be seen as
light, freely mobile, etc. If ''feather'' is a brand of eyeglasses, it's
assumed the glasses are light, easy to carry, etc. If ''feather'' is a
software company, it might be assumed the software is for mobile devices,
light (not bloated), etc.

Does this phenomenon already have a name?

I've considered calling this phenomenon ''entailment portability'' or
''association persistence'' but would really prefer to use an established
term if there is one.

If you know of academic papers that discuss this metaphor-related topic,
please let me know.

Thanks,

Anth
--------------------
Anthony Shore
anthony at OperativeWords.com
UCSC Linguistics, 1989 (Go slugs!) 

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics
                     Semantics




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-1757	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list