22.2062, Confs: Cognitive Science, Pragmatics, Discourse Anlaysis, Comp Ling/USA

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Fri May 13 15:42:50 UTC 2011


LINGUIST List: Vol-22-2062. Fri May 13 2011. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 22.2062, Confs: Cognitive Science, Pragmatics, Discourse Anlaysis, Comp Ling/USA

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Amy Brunett <brunett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature:  
Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility 
designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process 
abstracts online.  Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and 
begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, 
submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 12-May-2011
From: Wende Frost [wende.frost at asu.edu]
Subject: AAAI Symposium on Building Common Ground with Intelligent Agents
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:42:03
From: Wende Frost [wende.frost at asu.edu]
Subject: AAAI Symposium on Building Common Ground with Intelligent Agents

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=22-2062.html&submissionid=4519375&topicid=4&msgnumber=1
  

AAAI Symposium on Building Common Ground with Intelligent Agents 

Date: 04-Nov-2011 - 06-Nov-2011 
Location: Arlington, VA, USA 
Contact: Wende Frost 
Contact Email: wende.frost at nrl.navy.mil 
Meeting URL: https://sites.google.com/site/buildingcommonground2011/ 

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics; Discourse Analysis; Pragmatics 

Meeting Description: 

Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents

Much of the success of natural language interaction is caused by the participants' mutual understanding of the circumstances surrounding the communication.  These circumstances range from reminiscing about a shared experience, such as a birthday party, to coordinating fire-fighting efforts amongst a team using joint beliefs about mutual capabilities.  This mutual understanding of perceived context is termed 'common ground,' and is made up of all of the background and shared information that will lead to the eventual success of the communication.  Some measure of common ground is used in most, if not all, successful interactions between human actors.  For humans to have a convincing and beneficial experience interacting with intelligent agents, the agents must have mechanisms that support the fundamentals of common ground.  Otherwise, the consequence may be unsuccessful and incomplete interactions. 

This symposium aims to bring together researchers from robotics, artificial intelligence, human-computer interaction, computational linguistics, and cognitive modeling to share their diverse perspectives on common ground and its component factors.  This investigation of how existing work explicitly or implicitly uses aspects of common ground will bring us closer to a practical approach for a complete common ground in intelligent, computational agents.  Work to be presented may consist of currently implemented applications that contain common ground components, theoretical formalisms of these components, proposed frameworks, and work in progress.

Components of common ground include, but are not limited to, the following:

Background knowledge
World knowledge
Presuppositions
Mutual knowledge
Mutual beliefs
Beliefs about beliefs
Conversational maxims

Examples of how these components may have been incorporated into current work include:

Building of shared histories between actors
Representations of beliefs or beliefs about beliefs
Identifying and representing suppositions and presuppositions
Reasoning about other actors' beliefs
Creating untruthful or deceptive common ground
Formalizations of any common ground component
Agents or models which use common ground components in interaction
Discourse or dialogue models which use some aspect of common ground
Extraction of perlocutionary actions or effects from utterances
Inferring common ground
Using common ground to ground referents 










-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-22-2062	
----------------------------------------------------------


	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list