28.2389, Books: Concepts and Plural Predication: Poortman
The LINGUIST List
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Tue May 30 16:22:41 UTC 2017
LINGUIST List: Vol-28-2389. Tue May 30 2017. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 28.2389, Books: Concepts and Plural Predication: Poortman
Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté,
Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Michael Czerniakowski <mike at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:22:35
From: Martine Paulissen [gw.uilots.lot at uu.nl]
Subject: Concepts and Plural Predication: Poortman
Title: Concepts and Plural Predication
Subtitle: The effects of conceptual knowledge on the interpretation of reciprocal and
conjunctive plural constructions
Publication Year: 2016
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT)
http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Book URL: http://www.lotpublications.nl/concepts-and-plural-predication
Author: Eva B. Poortman
Paperback: ISBN: 9789460932250 Pages: 443 Price: Europe EURO 30.00
Abstract:
This dissertation studies the interpretation of plural sentences and its
connection to conceptual information in the human mind. The main claim is that
conceptual information on content words can affect the logical interpretation
of complex plural sentences, unlike what traditional formal semantic studies
of sentence meaning would expect. It is argued that this interaction is
governed by a new principle, the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis, which is
developed using insights on concepts from cognitive psychology.
Two types of plural sentences are studied experimentally: reciprocal sentences
and sentences with predicate conjunction. A series of experiments - both
behavioral and neurolinguistic - demonstrate that the interpretations of these
constructions vary systematically between speakers and between situations. The
Maximal Typicality Hypothesis uses conceptual information on verb concepts to
determine how acceptable plural sentences will be in a given situation. This
is done by singling out one situation as the core situation that is described
by a sentence. The core situation is an optimal ‘compromise’: the situation
that is maximal for the sentence among the situations that are most typical
for the concept(s) within it. The experiments that are reported in this
dissertation show that the MTH successfully accounts for the acceptability
patterns of plural sentences in different situations. This marks a substantial
advance in the analysis of plurals, and starts to bridge the gap between
semantic theories of language and cognitive theories of concepts.
This book is of interest to linguists working on plurality as well as
psychologists working on the structure of concepts. More generally, it is
relevant to scholars from any field who are interested in the general topic of
how language use and concepts in the human mind are intertwined.
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
General Linguistics
Written In: English (eng)
See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/books/get-book.cfm?BookID=116874
PUBLISHING PARTNER
Cambridge University Press
http://us.cambridge.org
MAJOR SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Akademie Verlag GmbH
http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de/akademie-verlag
Bloomsbury Linguistics (formerly Continuum Linguistics)
http://www.bloomsbury.com
Brill
http://www.brill.nl
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
http://www.c-s-p.org
Cascadilla Press
http://www.cascadilla.com/
Classiques Garnier
http://www.classiques-garnier.com/
De Gruyter Mouton
http://www.degruyter.com/
Edinburgh University Press
http://www.euppublishing.com
Elsevier Ltd
http://www.elsevier.com/
Equinox Publishing Ltd
http://www.equinoxpub.com/
European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
http://www.elra.info/
Georgetown University Press
http://www.press.georgetown.edu/
John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Lincom GmbH
http://www.lincom-shop.eu/
MIT Press
http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Multilingual Matters
http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG
http://www.narr.de/
Oxford University Press
oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan
http://www.palgrave.com/
Peter Lang AG
http://www.peterlang.com/
Rodopi
http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis)
http://www.routledge.com/
Springer
http://www.springer.com/
University of Toronto Press
http://www.utpjournals.com/
Wiley-Blackwell
http://www.wiley.com/
OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Association of Editors of the Journal of Portuguese Linguistics
http://www.fl.ul.pt/revistas/JPL/JPLweb.htm
International Pragmatics Assoc.
http://ipra.ua.ac.be/
Linguistic Association of Finland
http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
http://www.morganclaypool.com/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT)
http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Seoul National University
http://j-cs.org/index/index.php
SIL International Publications
http://www.sil.org/resources/publications
Universitat Jaume I
http://www.uji.es/CA/publ/
University of Nebraska Press
http://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/
Utrecht institute of Linguistics
http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-28-2389
----------------------------------------------------------
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
http://multitree.org/
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list