LL-L "Etymology" 2002.01.31 (04) [E]

Lowlands-L sassisch at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 31 19:53:49 UTC 2002


======================================================================
 L O W L A N D S - L * 31.JAN.2002 (04) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
 Web Site: <http://www.geocities.com/sassisch/rhahn/lowlands/>
 Rules: <http://www.geocities.com/sassisch/rhahn/lowlands/rules.html>
 Posting Address: <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>
 Server Manual: <http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html>
 Archive: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html>
=======================================================================
 A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian L=Limburgish
 LS=Low Saxon (Low German) S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================

From: Sandy Fleming [sandy at scotstext.org]
Subject: "Etymology"

> From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Etymology

> Neither can I.  But apparently this connection has not been made.  Or
> has it?  I wonder if Welsh etymologists have come up with Latin _lumen_
> Welsh _llumon_.

I wonder if there are any Welsh etymologists? Y Geiriadur Mawr
unfortunately gives no etymology for anything even though it
translates as "The Big Dictionary"!

> From: AEDUIN at aol.com
> Subject: LL-L "Etymology" 2002.01.30 (09) [E]
>
> Dear Sandy
>
> By the time the Romano-British were facing the Anglo-Saxons the Roman
> invasion was roughly 400 years  in the past. There was no Roman assistance
> with which to ally. Any borrowings would have been before this
> date. In fact
> they may not have been borrowings but part of the evolving of a Lingua
> Latina.

Edwin,

I believe I was corrected on this very point the last time Roman
Britain came up on the list! While I would say I know a reaasonable
amount of history, chronology seems a particularly weak point with me.

I suppose that since I was talking about Welsh and place names
in Wales in the etymology discussion I should have stuck to the
Romans in Wales. They seem to have had a particularly strong
military presence in south east Wales, so the Romanisation of
Welsh (as opposed to other types of Brythonic) may have been
particularly pronounced.

Sandy
http://scotstext.org
A dinna dout him, for he says that he
On nae accoont wad ever tell a lee.
                          - C.W.Wade,
                    'The Adventures o McNab'

==================================END===================================
 You have received this because your account has been subscribed upon
 request. To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l"
 as message text from the same account to
 <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or sign off at
 <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
 * Please submit postings to <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>.
 * Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
 * Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
 * Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
   to be sent to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or at
   <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
 * Please use only Plain Text format, not Rich Text (HTML) or any other
   type of format, in your submissions
=======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list