LL-L "Language varieties" 2005.12.06 (07) [E]
Lowlands-L
lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Wed Dec 7 01:11:20 UTC 2005
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================
06 December 2005 * Volume 07
=======================================================================
From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <ingmar.roerdinkholder at WORLDONLINE.NL>
Subject: LL-L "Language varieties" 2005.12.06 (06) [E/E]
Yes, irregular, but we Neerlandophones already explained that "zich" is a
later loan-word from High German.
Speaking of irregularity and German, I'd like to pose the question if it
isn't irregular that German does have "sich" but not *"sir", like it does
have the pairs "mich-mir" and "dich-dir". And what about "euch", no *"eur"
next to it?
ich mich mir
du dich dir
er ihn ihm + sich
sie ihr + sich
wir uns
ihr euch
sie ihr + sich
Ingmar
>R. F. Hahn
>It's about the ending: _-k_ or _-ch_. In German and Low Saxon it's
regular
>between the first and third (reflexive) pronoun:
>German: _ich_, sich_ (also _mich_ and _dich_ for the 1st and 2nd persons)
>Low Saxon: _ik_, _sik_ (in Eastphalian also _mik_ and _dik_ for _mi_ and
>_di_)
>Dutch: _iK_ vs _ziCH_
>... and that's irregular.
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list