LL-L "Ethnicity" 2005.06.17 (09) [E]

Lowlands-L lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Fri Jun 17 21:59:04 UTC 2005


======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 17.JUN.2005 (09) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Tom Carty <cartyweb at hotmail.com>
Subject: LL-L "Ethnicity" 2005.06.17 (07) [E] Im not white... Im Negroically
challenged!

The same as family names tell of the tribe - in Irelands case - you are, or
the trade your people had, they are only to trace ancestry, not to be
accurate.

How many Smiths cant handle a hammer? Do they object to being called Smith?

So my family is O' Carty, but my mother is O'Donoghue, her mother O' Reilly
her mother was Drake; my fathers Coyle, hers Hourican, hers Treacy... does
that make me object to being called Carty?

Race is not an insult: ita a history... the three races in real terms are
Caucasian, made of Aryan and Semetic, Negroid, and Mongol, as in Whites
(also including Arabs and Indians), African and Australian Blacks, and
Chinese, Native American, Eskimo and allied peoples.

Everything has to be classified: this is taking politically correct too far.

Should we call Whites as being Negroically challenged - as in they are not
black enough?

Tom

==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
  to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
  http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list