LL-L "Syntax" 2005.05.19 (13) [E]

Lowlands-L lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Thu May 19 23:03:49 UTC 2005


======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 19.MAY.2005 (13) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: David Barrow <davidab at telefonica.net.pe>
Subject: LL-L "Syntax" 2005.05.19 (10) [E]

Talking about things syntax Ron, I noticed you used a contraction for
have = possess in the following exchange:

David (above):

> Does English really have a "plethora of dialects" as opposed to a variety
> of accents?

Well, David, it's oodles at any rate, looking at Britain alone.
.-----

which can lead to interesting ambiguities:

She's a friend that lives in Rome

David Barrow (a different David from the a.m)

----------

From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>
Subject: Syntax

Hi, different David!

> Well, David, it's oodles at any rate, looking at Britain alone.

Interesting!  I had in mind casual "it is oodles at any rate," replacing
"plethora" and "variety" with "oodles."  ("The word *is* oodles" or
colloquial "There's lots of them" instead of "There are lots of them.")

Oh, yes!  Identical contraction with "is" and "has" is an inexhaustible
source of entertainment for folks of our ilk, isn't it?  I found that it
occurs more in Australian English than in other dialects, so I'm used to it.

Cheers!
Reinhard/Ron

==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
  to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
  http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list