LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.10 (02) [E]
Lowlands-L
lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Fri Mar 10 16:08:58 UTC 2006
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================
10 March 2006 * Volume 02
=======================================================================
From: Ben J. Bloomgren <Ben.Bloomgren at asu.edu>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.09 (03) [E]
I assume <hv> was pronounced [hv] or [xv] in Old Norse.
Ron, HV sounds like some sort of intermediary between /v/ and /f/. Is it
just too difficult to pronounce /kv/ as /kv/?
Ben
----------
From: David Barrow <davidab at telefonica.net.pe>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.09 (09) [E]
> From: ANNETTE GIESBRECHT <beautyaround at email.com>
> Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.06 (10) [E]
>
> Reverse snob? Being able to distinguish wh from w has its advantages. It
> makes it easier to distinguish were from where in sentences. The Wh is
> something like this W(done with a breathy exhalation sound -not a loud
> one,
> but soft ) If your native language has the h as silent, you you may
> find it
> hard to do, and makes it hard to explain. . I won't get into in what
> area
> of Canada it is common -certainly not in the Prairies, but possibly in
> British Columbia especially Victoria which has a large (or had) a large
> British Population. I haven't lived in Ontario and the friends I know
> who
> did, are either Dutch immigrants or the children of such.
>
> Annette
>
Annette,
The 'ere's of 'were' and 'where' are pronounced differently regardless
of how 'wh' is pronounced. The comparison would have to be between
'wear' and 'where'
David Barrow
----------
From: Karl Schulte <kschulte01 at alamosapcs.com>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.09 (09) [E]
Concerning "distinguish were from where in sentences", they don't sound
anything alike; I suppose you mean in written language?
Karl Schulte
----------
From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <ingmar.roerdinkholder at WORLDONLINE.NL>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2006.03.09 (09) [E]
I think 'where' and 'were' are distinguished already by their vowel:
"wair" versus "wur", so no one would mix the two up when wh and w are
pronounced the same here.
Ingmar
>
>ANNETTE GIESBRECHT
>
>Reverse snob? Being able to distinguish wh from w has its advantages. It
>makes it easier to distinguish were from where in sentences. The Wh is
>something like this W(done with a breathy exhalation sound -not a loud
one,
>but soft ) If your native language has the h as silent, you you may find
it
>hard to do, and makes it hard to explain. . I won't get into in what
area
>of Canada it is common -certainly not in the Prairies, but possibly in
>British Columbia especially Victoria which has a large (or had) a large
>British Population. I haven't lived in Ontario and the friends I know who
>did, are either Dutch immigrants or the children of such.
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list