ihcequi doing it=?windows-1252?Q?=92s_?=applicative thing

[SASAKI Mitsuya]

John,

Thanks for the comment and the data.
Now the only remaining problem with this construal is that we have to 
assume two "ihcequi"'s, intransitive and transitive, like "ahci(vt/vi)".
Que chida academia!

Mitsuya SASAKI
The Department of Linguistics, the University of Tokyo
ll116003 at mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp

(2011/11/01 11:50), John Sullivan wrote:
> Ok Mitsuya and demás listeros,
> 	Half of the temporarily constituted and soon to be dissolved Nahuatl morphology academy here at Notre Dame thinks that perhaps:
> 1. te-, “non-specific human object” + ihcequi (intransitive), “corn toasts or is toasted” + -ia (applicative) + -ya (imperfect tense suffix) = teihcequiaya, “corn was toasted for people”
> 2. qui, “3rd person singular specific object” + ihcequi (transitive), “to toast something” + ya, (imperfect tense suffix) = quihcequiya, “she was toasting it”
> and the other half is reluctant to make a commitment to a firm decision on the matter.
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Nahuatl mailing list
> Nahuatl at lists.famsi.org
> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/nahuatl

_______________________________________________
Nahuatl mailing list
Nahuatl at lists.famsi.org
http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/nahuatl