Fw: Fw: tarelki

[Andrew Jameson]

Replies to Svetlana please!

> From: Svetlana Nikitina <snikitin at ssees.ac.uk>
> To: Andrew Jameson <a.jameson at dial.pipex.com>
> Cc: russian teaching <russian-teaching at mailbase.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: Fw: tarelki
> Date: 13 April 1999 18:53
>
>    Hello to all partipants in the lively discussion about 'tarelki'.
>    As a native speaker and linguist I can also say that 'polozsit' i
> 'klast' are quite OK with 'tarelki'.
>    At the same time 'stavit', 'postavit' can be used with 'tarelki', but
> in a very limited way. For example:
>   Postavit' stakan na tarelku.
>
>   I would not use 'stavit' with food put on a plate. Only if it is in a
> cooking pot.
>
>    With best wishes
>
>    Svetlana Nikitina, PhD student
>    School of Slavonic and East European Studies
>    University of London
>    21/22 Russell Square
>    London WC1B 5EA
>
>
> > ----------
> > > From: Benjamin Rifkin <brifkin at facstaff.wisc.edu>
> > > To: SEELANGS at CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
> > > Subject: tarelki
> > > Date: 11 April 1999 02:58
> > >
> > > Dear Colleagues:
> > >
> > > Again I turn to you for linguistic help.  My emigre students are insisting
> > > that with the object tarelki the verbs klast' and polozhit' are not only
> > > acceptable, but required, rather than the verbs stavit'/postavit'.  I
 would
> > > appreciate any comments you might have on this topic!
> > >
> > > Ben Rifkin
> > >
> > >         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Benjamin Rifkin, Assoc. Prof. of Slavic Languages, UW-Madison
> > > Coordinator of Russian-Language Instruction
> > > 1432 Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Dr., Madison, WI  53706
> > > voice:  608/262-1623; fax:  608/265-2814