Winnebago =ire
Rory M Larson
rlarson at unlnotes01.unl.edu
Tue Jun 17 01:41:38 UTC 2003
I have a couple of questions about the Winnebago
pluralizing particle =ire. I was wondering if
any of the Hochank specialists in particular
would be willing to respond?
1. How would you describe the relationship
between =ire and =wi? I understand that
=wi is a general pluralizer that can be
employed anywhere, while =ire is restricted
to the 3rd person plural. Is there any
semantic distinction between them? For
3rd plural, when would you use =ire, and
when would you prefer =wi?
2. In Lipkind, I found that =ire can be used
for both active and stative verbs. The
example given for an active verb was /xe/,
"bury" (or was it "dig"?).
xe xa=wi xa=ire
The example given for a stative verb was
/sh?ak'/, meaning "old". I recall the
"they are old" form as being
sh?agire
(Now I'm forgetting if that glottal was
there or not. Correct me if I'm wrong!)
I assume that /sh?ak'/ is related to OP
/iNsh?age/, meaning "old man". I assume
its original form would be something like
/*sh?ake/.
Would it be correct to say that the =ire
ending conditions a-grade ablaut in active
verbs, but not in stative ones?
Thanks for any advice you can offer!
Rory
More information about the Siouan
mailing list