FW: Siouan accent and long syllables

Wed May 21 21:13:48 UTC 2014

________________________________
From: Emilia Aigotti <aigotm at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 15:46
To: Siouan Linguistics
Subject: Re: Siouan accent and long syllables

Did you read about Dorsey's Law? Wolff 1950 has a good explanation of it although I haven't totally wrapped my head around it. Don't forget though, it is believed that Chiwere doesn't have vowel length. Here is an excerpt from my paper from Miner 1979. Not sure this helps at all. I just jumped in on this conversation…

Emilia

3.1.3 Hypotheses on Chiwere/Hoocąk Relationship.  Miner (1979) gives examples of the relationship between accent and stress patterns between Hoocąk and Chiwere.
1. third-mora accent in Winnebago  matches second-syllable accent in                                        Chiwere
2. Chiwere accented initial syllables correspond to Winnebago long                      initial syllables
3. Point two above corresponds to the instrumental prefixes.
This means, accented instrumentals in Chiwere closely resembled lengthened prefixes in Winnebago (and the same being true for unaccented and short vowels). The following is an excerpt from the chart Miner provides (p. 31) on the similarities between Hoocąk and Chiwere instrumentals.

________________________________
From: Ryan Kasak <ryan.kasak at GMAIL.COM>
To: SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Siouan accent and long syllables

Regarding Bryan's discussion of the conflict between syllable weight and expected μμμ́ pattern in Chiwere, it could simply be that the Weight-to-Stress Principle of Prince (1990) is ranked higher than the μμμ́ pattern, if we put this in the context of OT tableaux:

WSP>> μμμ́
/baaxoje/       WSP     μμμ́
->      a. báaxoje              *
        b. baaxóje      *!

It is thus more important that heavy syllables attract stress than adhere to the on-the-third-mora tendency we see. This hierarchy could help start to explain the disconnect between when to stress what in Chiwere. I haven't looked much into Hoocąk, so I don't know if this brief observation would hold true there as well.

In Mandan, there is a preference for left-aligned iambs, where long vowels are well-formed iambs: LĹ, LH́, H́.
/istawį/  -> [(i.stá).mį] 'eye'
/ruwąk/ -> [(nų.mą́k)] 'man'
/wį-ta-wįįh-e/ -> [(pta.mį́į).he] 'my sister'
/pąąpi-oʔš/ -> [(pą́ą).piʔš] 'he is thin' (said to male listener)

The only two exceptions to this is in compounds and in words involving preverbs/applicatives /i, e, aa, o/. In compounds, primary stress is assigned to the leftmost-available iamb. If no iamb is available, the stress does not cross the word boundary, resulting in deficient feet, i.e., a foot containing just a stressed Ĺ.

COMPOUNDS:

/paʔ/ 'head' + /hį/ 'hair' -> [(páʔ).hį] 'porcupine'
/wįʔ/ 'stone' + /ti/ 'house' -> [(mį́ʔ).ti] 'village'
/ho/ 'story' + /kirąąr/ 'tell' -> [(hó).ki.na<http://ki.na/>̨a.ro<http://a.ro/>ʔš] ’he is story-telling’ (said to male listener)

PREVERBS

/i/ directional + /aaki/ `be above' + /ta/ locative -> [(í).ʔaa.ki.ta] ’upward’
/o/ inessive + /wa/ 1st active + /kųh/ `want something' + /oʔš/ -> [(ó).wa.kų.hoʔš] 'I want something'

The stress placement in constructions with preverbs suggests that the phonology is sensitive to the morphological structure of non-simplex words. In Anderson’s (1992) A-Morphous Morphology, he calls words like those in the preverbs 'composites,' meaning that there is some internal structure: [ó- [wakųhoʔš]] ’I want something.’ The preverb isn't in the same domain as the inflected root is, and the left-aligned iambic stress assignment cannot corss over into the next domain to create a well-formed iamb, due to what Ito and Mester (1999) call a CrispEdge constraint, where some phonological processes are unable to cross certain boundaries.

I haven’t looked super seriously at other Siouan languages’ stress patterns, but I think that Lakota/Dakota likewise prefers iambic feet (sans the long vowels like in Mandan) except for cases of compounds and composites, but I'd be interested to see how well that guess plays out.

-Ryan

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Bryan James Gordon <linguist at email.arizona.edu<mailto:linguist at email.arizona.edu>> wrote:
It seems like there is some variation about how vowel length interacts with stress. I never have managed to figure out a simple, neat explanation for how it works in Ponca and Omaha. It seems like if one of the first two syllables has a long vowel, that one usually gets stressed, but not always. Sometimes the stress placement is more an indicator of morphology than phonology, e.g. "itháe" "I speak" vs. "íthae" "you speak". And when both vowels are underlyingly long it seems to me like there are morphological, phonological and "free" (across- and within-speaker) variations. And then there's the question of why "wa-" "them" seems to like stress more than "wa-" "us". Is "wa-" "them" underlyingly long?
I understand the situation in Ioway, Otoe and Missouria even less. Jimm may be able to help out here. I often notice when comparing recordings with each other or with Jimm's dictionary that words like "Baxoje" "Ioway" are stressed on different syllables by different speakers or even by the same speaker in different contexts. It seems like the first vowel in "Baxoje" is long, so there may be some sort of tension going on here between "Put stress on the third mora" and "Put stress on the first long vowel". The dictionary orthography (I think) puts stress on the first syllable.
On May 21, 2014 7:55 AM, "Rory Larson" <rlarson1 at unl.edu<mailto:rlarson1 at unl.edu>> wrote:
I have a question about the Siouan accent rule that I should know, but don’t.  Generally, Siouan accent likes to go on the second syllable.  Also, Siouan vowels are sometimes long.  Does a long vowel count as one syllable or two for purposes of the Siouan accent rule?  If we have a word with the vowel of the first syllable long,

                cvvcv

should Siouan accent it as

                cvvcV

or as

                cvVcv

?

Thanks,
Rory
-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu<http://listserv.unl.edu/>. Due to Yahoo's DMARC policy: listserv.unl.edu<http://listserv.unl.edu/> lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com
-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu<http://listserv.unl.edu/>. Due to Yahoo's DMARC policy: listserv.unl.edu<http://listserv.unl.edu/> lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com

-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu<http://listserv.unl.edu/>. Due to Yahoo's DMARC policy: listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com

-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. Due to Yahoo's DMARC policy: listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com

--
Manage your subscription at  http://listserv.unl.edu.
Due to Yahoo's DMARC policy: listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/siouan/attachments/20140521/dcda6bd2/attachment.htm>