Is Sign Language a Language?
Geoffrey Hunt
geoffrey_hunt at SIL.ORG
Sat May 3 21:54:59 UTC 2003
For any substantive argument on usage of the two alternatives I would have to
defer to others. You may be right in what you say in your second paragraph, I
just do not know. Personally, I prefer 'signed language' as it parallels more
clearly with 'spoken language' ('sign language' would parallel 'speech
language').
Geoffrey
-----Original Message-----
From: For the discussion of linguistics and signed languages.
[mailto:SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA]On Behalf Of Philocophus
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 12:24 PM
To: SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA
Subject: Re: Is Sign Language a Language?
I thank you for your response, but have one small query. Is there a difference
between the terms "sign language" and "signed language" which you use? If so,
what is the difference from a linguist's persective?
I thought "signed language" referd to something like "signed English" whereas
"sign language" refers to the sign language as used by the Deaf. Imay be wrong.
Raymond Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/slling-l/attachments/20030503/2548940c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Slling-l
mailing list