Sign language 'fieldwork'

Daisuke Sasaki daisukes at MUSASHINO-U.AC.JP
Thu Feb 2 23:56:42 UTC 2012


I appreciate the interesting discussion is going on, but we're discussing in two separate mailing lists, i.e., SLLING-L and SLLS lists.  Those who are subscribing either of these can't see the discussion carried on in the other list and may lose some points made in the other side.  So, could we stick on to one list?
Thanks.

Daisuke

On 12/02/02 14:03, Adam Schembri wrote:
> Hello SLLING-L and SLLS list members,
>
> Recently, a language documentation colleague asked me why there were so few sign language researchers conducting 'fieldwork'. She was reasonably well-informed about the field, and could name a few sign language linguists who were collecting data from micro-community/ 'village' sign language communities (e.g., in Bali), or from macro-community sign language communities in developing countries (e.g., Uganda), and identified them as doing sign language 'fieldwork'.
>
> I could see her point, but I thought this was an interesting perspective, because (without wanting to diminish the challenges of those who work on sign languages in places like Bali and Uganda), I have always considered myself an 'urban fieldworker' working on the sign language varieties cities in Australia and the UK. I read the definition below, and I feel that the Auslan and BSL corpus projects I have worked on do (more or less) fit the bill:
>
> Bowern(2008:7) “…what is ‘fieldwork’? My definition is rather broad. It involves the collection of accurate data in an ethical manner. It involves producing a result which both the community and the linguist approve of. That is, the ‘community’ (the people who are affected by your being there collecting data) should know why you’re there, what you’re doing, and they should be comfortable with the methodology and the outcome. You should also be satisfied with the arrangements. The third component involves the linguist interacting with a community of speakers at some level. That is, fieldwork involves doing research in a place where the language is spoken, not finding a speaker at your university and eliciting data from them".
>
> What do others think? Are many more of us 'fieldworkers' in Bowern's sense than our colleagues realise?
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
>
> --
> Assoc. Prof. Adam Schembri, PhD
> Director | National Institute for Deaf Studies and Sign Language
> La Trobe University | Melbourne (Bundoora) | Victoria | 3086 | Australia
> Tel: +61 3 9479 2887 | Fax: +61 3 9479 3074 |http://www.adamschembri.net/webpage/Welcome.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daisuke Sasaki
Associate Professor, Musashino University
mailto:daisukes at musashino-u.ac.jp   http://www.daisuke.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Slling-l mailing list