[sw-l] IMWA size and transparency

[Valerie Sutton]

Thank you, Sandy. I am not even finished with all the symbols as you
know. I hope to add them all by the end of 2004, but since there is so
much more to do, I think these formatting issues might as well wait
until I am done...but that is a kind offer, and I will remember it -
thank you...

And have a great trip...By the way, I finally saw your beautiful
diagram in SignWriting...the joke you talked about...that actually
didn't show up in one of my three browsers...I can't remember which one
- but the others showed the drawing and it is really lovely looking...

Val ;-)




On Oct 26, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Sandy Fleming wrote:

> Val,
>
> I'm sure there are plenty of graphical-formats programmers who would be
> happy to write a little (I think it would be little?) program to go
> through
> the IMWA and trim all the excess white. I haven't tried programming
> graphical formats myself but it's something I'd like to learn to do.
> So as
> long as I can find the necessary how-to stuff I could probably do it
> for you
> unless someone else does.
>
> I'm going away on Thursday for a week, but after that I could try it.
>
> Sandy
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> [mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu]On Behalf Of Valerie
>> Sutton
>> Sent: 26 October 2004 16:46
>> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> Subject: Re: [sw-l] IMWA size and transparency
>>
>>
>> SignWriting List
>> October 26, 2004
>>
>> Stephen Slevinski wrote:
>>> I'm not sure.  One advantage for trimmed symbols is that programs
>>> could
>>> produce smaller signs.
>>>
>>
>> I cannot deny, that I am mad at myself, for not discussing this with
>> you before you started using the new IMWA...I am sorry....If it could
>> have made smaller signs, that would have been a good thing...oh
>> well...
>>
>> Val ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>
>