Sign for Tokyo
iroald at HOTMAIL.COM
Thu Aug 11 15:59:37 UTC 2005
I read the right sign (the one from Northern Ireland) as the two hands doing
oposite movements (left hand going diagonally up while right hand is is
going diagoanlly down, and vice versa)
ps: the sign we were shown in Maastricht had one straight up movement, both
hands at the same time
>From: "Valerie Sutton" <sutton at signwriting.org>
>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Sign for Tokyo
>Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:57:30 -0700
>August 11, 2005
>>Shane Ó hEorpa from Northern Ireland wrote:
>>That’s my sign for Tokyo – a bit of a deviation u may notice!
>Hello Shane and Midori!
>THANK YOU, Shane, for posting some SignWriting. You have made me very very
>And now I want to ask you both...Which sign is more accurate? The one on
>the left, is writing movement twice up-diagonally, but the emphasis is on
>the up-up. The sign on the right is writing the same movement, but instead
>the emphasis is even...up-down-up...
>A different feeling to the movement...I would actually pronounce (produce)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4698 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Sw-l