[sw-l] Adding Classifiers to SignPuddle Dictionaries

[Valerie Sutton]

SignWriting List
March 15, 2005

Ok, Stephen...So tell us what to do...Should we enter classifiers into
SignPuddle right now, and if yes, then in what format?...CL:3 for
example...does not have underscores....Or should we wait altogether
until your programming is ready......Val ;-)

--------------------


On Mar 15, 2005, at 3:41 PM, Stephen Slevinski wrote:

> Hi Val,
>
> I think she was refering to sending mail with SignPuddle.  When you
> send
> mail, you use gloss.  You have no chance to modify the signs.
>
> This will change.  In the future, you will be able to build emails
> interactively.  First you could search for signs (by gloss or symbol),
> modify the sign (using SignMaker), and then add it to the email.  When
> this
> is possible, having general classifiers in a dictionary would be more
> useful.
>
> -Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> [mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu]On Behalf Of Valerie Sutton
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:23 PM
> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] Adding Classifiers to SignPuddle Dictionaries
>
>
> SignWriting List
> March 15, 2005
>
> On Mar 15, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Nancy Emery wrote:
>> But for actually using them - since the location, movement and
>> orientation
>> have to be added anyway, since they depend on what is being said with
>> the
>> classifier, I'm not sure that it would be much more helpful to take
>> the
>> handshape from the dictionary than just to compose the sign from
>> scratch....
>> It's just that in certain texts some classifier constructions are used
>> over
>> and over, and it is nice to be able to cut, paste and modify rather
>> than
>> rebuild the whole thing.  But I don't know that dictionary signs can
>> be
>> modified by the user anyway...
>
> Signs can be modified in the public SignPuddles, if you are a
> Dictionary Editor with a password. I can invite you to be an Editor, if
> you wish, and you could try to enter a few classifiers and then point
> us to them on the web and we can all look at them...how about that? A
> good way to discuss the issue...
>
> Val ;-)
>