sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG
Tue Mar 21 23:10:41 UTC 2006
March 21, 2006
Trevor Jenkins in the UK wrote:
> Not sure I agree with the notion that the Roman alphabet is a
> Certainly not one in any mathematical sense. The ordering of the
> is purely arbitrary. We could just as easily remember the list as
> A, Z, B,
> Y, ... M, L or any other random arrangement Z, Y, W, ... C, B, A. The
> underlying meanings of the letters would not alter any. Easy to
> demonstrate by looking at Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, German, French,
> Greek, Russian, or a myriad languages using Roman symbols. There are
> additions to and deletions from the list. The more mathematically
> can correct me but surely alphabet is a `bag' rather than a sequence
> defined over some order. Whereas there is (some deliberate) order
> in the symbols of SignWriting.
Hello Trevor and Everyone!
Thanks for the message above..yes I think of an alphabet as a bag of
symbols too, but it is Alphabetical Order that puts them in a
So the alphabet is a group of symbols, and the order is specified by
the Alphabetical Order...
Anyway - enough with words!
I vote for writing signs and forgetting spoken languages for
How are you Trevor? It is great to hear from you again? Are you
programming at all?
More information about the Sw-l