Little Miss Muffet - receptive or expressive

[Ingvild Roald]

I agree that for transcription and captioning, receptive is easier. But we 
should all agree on some way to tell that we are writing receptive, say we 
used the qutation mark symbols for that? Just a suggestion

Ingvild





>From: "Valerie Sutton" <signwriting at MAC.COM>
>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Little Miss Muffet
>Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:54:31 -0700
>
>SignWriting List
>April 14, 2007
>
>What a great excitement to see this first video captioned  receptively, 
>Adam!
>
>And I agree with Ingvild and Charles - this is fabulous!
>
>I noticed a few things in the writing that need to be discussed...is  there 
>a way for you to post to the list, just the SignWriting itself?...
>
>Then I could give you feedback on the Receptive writing...
>
>Many thanks for doing this...this is a blessing...
>
>Val ;-)
>
>
>
>
>On Apr 14, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Charles Butler wrote:
>
>>This is fabulous, it is well written, and exciting to see.  We  definitely 
>>need more receptive sign writing.  I think we should all  learn both, as 
>>it will be much easier to explain.  Write what you  see, whether someone 
>>else or yourself signing.
>>
>>Charles
>>
>>
>>Adam Frost <adam at frostvillage.com> wrote: Here's my take on the  
>>captioning of Little Miss Muffet. I tried out the receptive view  out. I 
>>took out a lot of the white from my graphic program to make  it so that 
>>Cherie's signing wouldn't get block as much. What do you  all think?
>>
>>http://mojiti.com/kan/2378/10143
>>
>>Adam
>>
>
>