Welcome back Stefan

[Jonathan]

Welcome back Stefan!!!

P.S. Did you finish the Sign names fonts you were working on?  Or did
that get put on the back burner now that we aren't currently any lessons
on the list?

Jonathan

Stefan Wöhrmann wrote:
>
> Hi Valerie, Cherie and listmembers --
>
>  
>
> -          well I am back online -- smile --
>
>  
>
> You folks have been so incredible active! Too many messages -- so that
> I will need some time to catch up with what is discussed ...
>
>  
>
> Looking at your video Cherie -- I would write it this way
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> All the best
>
>  
>
> Stefan
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Von:* owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> [mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] *Im Auftrag von *Cherie Wren
> *Gesendet:* Samstag, 28. April 2007 16:52
> *An:* sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> *Betreff:* Re: [sw-l] Shurley 4
>
>  
>
> I always have troubles with the rotations...  that is my signing, not
> a transcription.  The two 'baby x's facing each other, then the right
> hand twists down twice and the left hand twists up twice while the
> palms continue to face each other--  best way I can describe it in
> words.  Here is a clip.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "adam at frostvillage.com" <adam at frostvillage.com>
> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:05:09 AM
> Subject: RE: [sw-l] Shurley 4
>
>  
>
> Cherie,
>
> I was just reading your jingle. Very interesting. :-) Very well
> written too. They only sign that I had a problem with was (I am
> guessing) modify. The way that it was written is the same movement
> that would be for a vertical "dead" or "opening the right door while
> closing the left door." I took me a few tries of signing it to see
> what you were saying. I think that the movement for modify (at least
> the way I sign it) is the same as signing class except the left hand
> goes the opposite way. I don't know if I am right in my movement
> writing, but I was thinking that the movement was better written this
> way. But if you are transcribing and the person signed it the way I
> mentioned before, then keep it. :-)
>
> Adam
>
> PS I'll try to get a clip of my signing the two movements as a picture
> is worth a thousand words.
>
> Load message into SignText
> <http://www.signbank.org/signpuddle/signtext/signtext.html?list=03-01-001-01-01-01,113,63,01-09-023-01-02-08,136,111,01-09-023-01-02-16,107,111,02-09-014-01-01-01,161,109,02-09-014-01-02-04,83,107,08-02-001-01-01-05,124,143,sign-1,0>
>
> Courtesy of SignBank.org <http://www.signbank.org>
>
> 337e55242c3367ad66f00b5c9bd745bb = 337e55242c3367ad66f00b5c9bd745bb
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http:/autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM->
>
>

-- 

Jonathan & Yolaine Duncan
8-)  & ;-)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070430/c94d9073/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2493 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070430/c94d9073/attachment.jpe>