Wiki article on SignWriting

[Valerie Sutton]

Cherie -
If you ever get a chance to do more on the Wiki article (and if you  
cannot I understand)...

You know the links at the bottom of the article that refer people to  
other related topics?

Can you add a link to SignBank and SignPuddle Online? Many thanks for  
all this...

SignBank
http://www.SignBank.org

SignPuddle Online
http://www.SignBank.org/signpuddle

Val ;-)

PS. SignBank 8.5 is coming ...I have not forgotten!

---------




On May 19, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Valerie Sutton wrote:

> SignWriting List
> May 19, 2007
>
> Cherie Wren wrote:
>> I have been playing with Wikipedia...  check out the article on  
>> SignWriting and see if anything needs to be changed.  I rewrote  
>> the section on basic principles, and added some images of stuff I  
>> wrote.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SignWriting#Basic_Principles
>>
>> cherie
>
> ----------
>
> Hello Cherie!
> This is wonderful. THANK YOU. The old article needed improvement...  
> And I really like what you have said....This is so much better than  
> before...
>
> I wonder...is there a way to actually show the handshapes in  
> SignWriting while you are discussing them?..For example, when you  
> mention the square for a fist, it could link to:
>
> http://www.signwriting.org/lessons/lessonsw/026%20Basic- 
> Handshapes.html
>
> The term "pentagon shape" ....I have no clue what a pentagon looks  
> like....So the more visual you make it the better...or link to  
> diagrams on the web...
>
> But what you have done is really good...Can you place a paragraph  
> about SignPuddle Software and link to it?
>
> We actually need a separate Wikipedia article about SignPuddle  
> Software too...people need to know where to go to search for signs  
> already written, and how to create signs themselves on the web...
>
> And I think your link to your SignWriting document is perfect!
>
> Maybe a Wikipedia article about SignWriting Literature, linking to  
> all the documents written in SignWriting would be a good idea too...
>
> Thank you once again, Cherie!
>
> Val ;-)
>