old version of SignPuddle

[Ronald Dettloff]

I mainly like it because I can easily copy and paste 4 columns into Microsoft Word.
 
Rev. Ronald H. Dettloff, 20880 Ten Mile Road, St. Clair Shores, MI 48080
Other Web links:           http://theshoreschurch.org/ME2/Audiences/Default.asp 
































----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Slevinski <slevin at signpuddle.net>
To: SignWriting List <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:56:08 AM
Subject: Re: [sw-l] old version of SignPuddle





  
  

Hi Bill,



Ron likes the old Translate feature.  With the 1.0 translate, you can
save the gloss and you'll always get the same SignWriting output.  With
the 1.5 translate, you are not guaranteed the same SignWriting because
the new translate is based on choice.



It's the difference between using "you_3" to get the correct sign and
using "you" and selecting the 3rd sign.



If you have a long verse and you want to change a single sign, you can
change "you_3" to "you_4" and you're done.  However, with 1.5, you'll
need to make a selection for every sign that has multiple choices.



Regards,

-Steve



Bill Reese wrote:

  
Ron,

Just out of curiosity, why do you prefer Signpuddle 1.0 over 1.5?  Is
it because 1.0 still has all the graphic entries from the old DOS
version of Signwriting or what is there about Signpuddle 1.0 that makes
it more suitable to the way you work?

  

Bill

  

  

Ronald Dettloff wrote:
  
    
    Yes
please keep it.

    

Sign Puddle TM   6448 signs United States and Canada

    

with the translate box   (see attached file)

    

That is the one we use.

    

    

    

    

     

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rev. Ronald H. Dettloff, 20880 Ten Mile Road, St. Clair
Shores,
MI 48080

    Other Web links:           http://theshoreschurch.org/ME2/Audiences/Default.asp
    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    -----
Original Message ----

From: Steve Slevinski <slevin at signpuddle.net>

To: SignWriting List <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>

Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:06:32 PM

Subject: Re: [sw-l] old version of SignPuddle

    

Hi Ron,

    

Do you need me to re-enable SignMaker for SignPuddle 1.0?  If so, which
dictionaries?

    

Regards,

-Steve

    

Ronald Dettloff wrote:
    
      Please
don't remove SignPuddle 1.0  Dana and I prefer it and it works much
better with what we are doing. I was afraid this might happen one day.
Our project depends on Sign Puddle 1.0

      

    
    

    

    

    

    



____________________________________________

SW-L SignWriting List

Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/

Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
  
  

  



____________________________________________

SW-L SignWriting List

Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/

Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20071027/cd282fa9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------



____________________________________________

SW-L SignWriting List

Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/

Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l