[Fwd: Re: [sw-l] Handwriting: Val's Shorthand Suggestions]
Valerie Sutton
sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG
Tue Dec 30 21:44:55 UTC 2008
SignWriting List
December 30, 2008
Hello Jonathan!
Thank you for your posts to the List and yes, I did receive your posts
and so did the SW LIst. I am just a couple days behind and I am trying
to catch up, and I certainly plan to answer your messages
shortly...thanks for your input!
Regarding searching to see if your messages have made the List or not,
you can always check the SW List Archives. Go to:
SW List Archives
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
and click on Archive 3 or 4...there are several ways of searching for
your messages...by date, or author or subject matter...it is a great
tool and you will find your messages there...
So at the moment the List software seems to be working...it is just
Val who can't work fast enough - ha!
So now it is my turn to answer you and it is coming shortly - thanks
for writing once again -
Val ;-)
-------
On Dec 30, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Jonathan y Yolaine wrote:
> Hi Val,
> I sent these emails to the list. I don't know if you saw them or
> not. Please let me know. They came in to me right away but as
> there have been some problems with the list in the past I just
> wanted to ask.
>
> Jonathan
>
> From: Jonathan <duncanjonathan at yahoo.ca>
> Date: December 29, 2008 10:50:21 AM PST
> To: "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] Handwriting: Val's Shorthand Suggestions
> Reply-To: "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
>
>
>
>
> Valerie Sutton wrote:
>>
>> SignWriting List
>> December 22, 2008
>>
>> Hello Sandy!
>> Thank you for this email...my answers are in-between your
>> paragraphs below ;-)
>>
>> Sandy Fleming wrote:
>>> I've tried writing with these "shorthand" suggestions and I too,
>>> love
>>> it! This seems to bring the feel of SignWriting much closer to the
>>> feel
>>> of writing rather than drawing to me. The signs are written more
>>> simply
>>> so that once I've written one a few times it becomes much easier to
>>> write it again without having to think about how it's made.
>>
>>
>> Wonderful! I am glad to hear this Sandy!
>>
>> In the 1970s and 1980s we had real success with the Shorthand, not
>> only for SignWriting but for DanceWriting too. As you know, I
>> taught DanceWriting at the Boston Conservatory of Music Dance
>> Department from 1976-1981, and it was a requirement of all Freshmen
>> to learn DanceWriting. I had 25 to 50 students in one classroom at
>> a time, and I would ask all of them to sit on the floor with rolls
>> of paper and to write "what they saw", looking at a dancer, without
>> looking down at their hands...I taught them a very specific system
>> that was written in two textbooks of mine...Dance Writing Shorthand
>> for Classical Ballet and DanceWriting Shorthand for Modern and Jazz
>> Dance, and people really learned a systematic way of writing dance
>> by hand...this was then applied to writing SignWriting Shorthand,
>> and that book was written in 1981 I believe...we did hundreds of
>> signs in a dictionary written in the shorthand in that textbook,
>> and it is from that book that Dr. Karen van Hoek started to use the
>> Shorthand as a handwriting and insisted back around year 2000 that
>> we officially make the shorthand, the SW cursive handwriting...and
>> it is really my fault that we did not do it immediately...as we
>> have recently discussed here, I felt like other things took
>> priority, and also the old Shorthand book only has the symbols
>> related to how we wrote in the 1980s, so the book would need to be
>> expanded to fit with the writing in 2009...but if you are
>> interested, here on the SW List, to help me, I could scan in one
>> page at a time of the old Shorthand book and we could all read it
>> together and then adapt it together to fit our modern times? If you
>> are game, I am...we could do two pages a week or something like
>> that...
> Hi Val,
> I think that it's a great idea. I was about to volunteer to
> offer to clean up and put the scanned pages together into a PDF for
> you so that you can post it on your web site. I am still offering.
> Then we would have the old Shorthand book for historical and
> inspirational reasons. That's if you could scan it all and send it
> to me. Even if you don't have time to scan it all at once, it would
> be ok. Does the handbook have many pages?
>
> I am game to help with the shorthand. 1 a page or 2 a week
> should be fine. Slow and steady wins the race !!! :-)
>
> For the last year, I have been drawing and signwriting most of
> my sign related notes. But recently, I´ve caught myself glossing
> instead because it is so much faster for me. I strongly agree withe
> others on the list that is is important to be able to write
> signwriting at a decent pace. This would make it so much more
> useful than it already is.
> I mentioned the Shorthand to my wife. She didn't know what it
> was about, then when I explained it to her, she said that would be
> happy that I learn. :-)
> I guess she finds I take a lot of time when I do my
> signwriting!!!:-)
>
> Of course, I wouldn't need true Shorthand, what Dr. Karen van
> Hoek suggested sounds like a very good idea to me. To use
> Shorthand like writing to improve the speed of writing.
>
> When do we start?
>
> Jonathan
>
> Sandy wrote....(see Val's comments below)...
>>>
>>> I've attached an attempt at writing a brief anecdote that runs in my
>>> family. Since it's not "phonetic" as SignWriting usually is and
>>> it's in
>>> BSL, you may have some difficulty with it, so I'll go through it
>>> here.
>>>
>>> The larger sign on the left says "elephant", which is my title for
>>> the
>>> story.
>>>
>>> Sign-for-sign, it then goes like this:
>>>
>>> aLongTimeAgo Scotland h-a-w-i-c-k | cousin me | andUncle me | street
>>> justWalkingAlong || circus carnivalComingTowardsThem
>>> bothWatchingItGoingBy finish || uncle askChild elephant didYouSee?
>>> ||
>>> cousinLooksUpAtHim elephant what? ||
>>>
>>> Or in English:
>>>
>>> A long time ago in Hawick in Scotland my cousin and uncle were
>>> walking
>>> along the street when a circus carnival came by. They watched it
>>> passing
>>> and when it was gone my uncle asked my cousin, "Did you see the
>>> elephant?" He said, "What elephant?"
>>>
>>> Some notes on the writing:
>>>
>>> elephant: the handshape here is a full "C" without the palm drawn. I
>>> hope this is clear enough for someone who's used to it.
>>>
>>> h-a-w-i-c-k: When signing with someone at a bar I noticed how she
>>> was
>>> holding her drink in one hand and doing two-handed fingerspelling
>>> with
>>> her free hand only. It occurred to me that you often see this and it
>>> might be a good way of writing two-handed fingerspelling in a
>>> simpler
>>> way that still makes sense to native BSLers. Combining this with
>>> Val's
>>> suggestion of not writing the palms, this is the result. I've
>>> sometimes
>>> written both hands when that emphasises the connection with the
>>> Latin
>>> letter, as for "K" in this word.
>>>
>>> andUncle: the single head nod which sometimes means "and" I've
>>> written
>>> without the arrowhead. I've been doing this for a long time for head
>>> nods and shakes.
>>>
>>> street: I perhaps wrote this sign too quickly as it's a bit out of
>>> shape! it's two "American-H" hands written with the palms because
>>> the
>>> orientation is unusual so I felt it had to be indicated.
>>>
>>> justWalkingAlong: I've missed out the arrowheads again, this time
>>> for
>>> the "relaxed pout" on the mouth indicating that the walk is "as
>>> normal".
>>> The half-arrowhead is horizontal, but if I'd been more careful it
>>> would
>>> have been diagonal!
>>>
>>> circus: I hope this is clear, it's supposed to be twisting three
>>> curved
>>> fingers (thumb, index and middle) about the nose like a clown nose.
>>>
>>> carnivalComingTowardsUs: again, I wrote the palms because I felt the
>>> orientation was unusual.
>>>
>>> bothWatchingItGoingBy: for a while now I've just repeated
>>> arrowheads to
>>> indicate repeated movements, so this arrow is swept through three
>>> times,
>>> in BSL indicating an activity that went on for some time.
>>>
>>> finish: the two little lines are thumbs; the arrows are supposed
>>> to be
>>> moving upwards but I didn't draw them doubled; I didn't worry so
>>> much
>>> about clarity because this sign is used very frequently and
>>> couldn't be
>>> mistaken for anything else.
>>>
>>> what: again, I've missed the arrowheads as this shaking from side to
>>> side movement should be clear enough to BSLers.
>>>
>>> Will everybody be able to see this? What's best to submit graphics
>>> in,
>>> PNG, GIF or JPEG?
>>>
>>> Sandy Fleming
>>
>> ------
>>
>> Val finishes:
>>
>> WOW! This is amazingly close to what the sw shorthand looks like
>> back in the 1980s...you just made my heart sing!
>>
>> I have to go out for an appointment right now, but when I come
>> back, I will try to give you some feedback on the symbols in the
>> Shorthand and you will see that your writing and our Shorthand are
>> very close...
>>
>> I only wish I could find Karen van Hoek...Karen - if you are out
>> there, please write to us...you have so much skill with using
>> Shorthand as a daily writing system...
>>
>> I have been searching for Karen for some time ..... so if anyone
>> knows how to contact Karen please tell me!
>>
>> We miss you Karen - Lucinda O'Grady Batch asked me about you the
>> other day and sends her love to you...
>>
>> So later I will write again, Sandy, to show you how similar signs
>> would be written in the Shorthand and you will see it is
>> close...congratulations on picking this up so quickly and thank you
>> too, for taking the time...I really appreciate it ;-))
>>
>> Val ;-)
>>
>> Sandy's diagram attached:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> SW-L SignWriting List
>>
>> Post Message
>> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>
>> List Archives and Help
>> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>>
>> Change Email Settings
>> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1864 - Release Date:
>> 12/25/2008 9:40 AM
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
>
>
> From: Jonathan <duncanjonathan at yahoo.ca>
> Date: December 29, 2008 10:50:28 AM PST
> To: "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] New attempt at a favicon for signwriting
> Reply-To: "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
>
>
> Hi Val,
> I think it looks good. How many variations do you have so far?
>
> Jonathan
>
> Valerie Sutton wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 22, 2008, at 5:22 PM, KJ wrote:
>>> I actually prefer it without the yellow background and with the
>>> two arrows... or perhaps the zig-zag movement that you use for
>>> your namesign, Val? That feels more like "write" to me...
>>> KJ
>>
>> ok - how about this? I fit it!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> SW-L SignWriting List
>>
>> Post Message
>> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>
>> List Archives and Help
>> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>>
>> Change Email Settings
>> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1864 - Release Date:
>> 12/25/2008 9:40 AM
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
>
>
> From: Jonathan <duncanjonathan at yahoo.ca>
> Date: December 29, 2008 10:50:42 AM PST
> To: sandy at scotstext.org, "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> >
> Subject: [sw-l] Dot for symbol orientation
> Reply-To: "SignWriting List" <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
>
>
> Hi Sandy,
>
> Sandy Fleming wrote:
>>
>> André,
>>
>> Well, the point of the "horseshoe" method was to avoid two
>> unnecessary
>> corners in the handshape and so make it faster and easier to write.
>> The
>> fact that "fist" handshapes then become less symmetrical and can
>> then be
>> written without forearms is just a bonus.
>>
>> The "circle" hand is already round and making it less symmetrical
>> would
>> probably make it harder to write. I really can't think of a solution
>> that's any better than just writing the forearms as is already done.
>>
>> I remember Val saying some time ago that the symmetry of some
>> handshapes
>> was a problem for typists: it was easy to forget which orientation
>> was
>> being used while typing. What I suggested was that a small round
>> dot or
>> similar mark be drawn by the software at the wrist, so as to show the
>> orientation. Typists would just see a slight bump at the middle of
>> the
>> base of the handshape so that they'd be able to see the
>> orientation, and
>> it would be part of the font, the typist wouldn't have to actually
>> type
>> it and the reader would see it in every handshape. This would make
>> the
>> forearms unnecessary in computer SignWriting, as you're asking.
>>
> I think that a small round dot where the forearms contact the
> hand is a great idea too. It would keeping the data entry straight,
> which will be important if someone wants to analyze the signs'
> symbol rotations at a latter time.
> I had thought of including a feature like that in my program but
> I will have to be for a future version.
>
> Jonathan
>> Orientation isn't difficult to follow when handwriting so in
>> handwriting
>> this wouldn't be needed, and for a few signs involving the circle
>> hand,
>> the writer might want to add forearms if required for clarity.
>>
>> Sandy
>>
>> On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 14:29 -0500, Gagnon et Thibeault wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sandy, Val and everyone,
>>>
>>> Val, I will send you one page by fax today.
>>>
>>> Sandy, You gave us an example of COFFEE. It is a wonderful
>>> idea . I
>>> would like you to show us how to signwrite an orientation of the
>>> hand in
>>> round without forearms. When Val posts it on the SW-list, you see
>>> my
>>> attached diagram.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> SW-L SignWriting List
>>
>> Post Message
>> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>
>> List Archives and Help
>> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>>
>> Change Email Settings
>> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081230/64797353/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mime-attachment.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 42583 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081230/64797353/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mime-attachment.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4372 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081230/64797353/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list