AW: [sw-l] Movement to the side
Anne-Claude Prélaz Girod
acpg at VTXNET.CH
Fri Nov 28 11:20:26 UTC 2008
I think the graphic below is really usefull to help understand,....
and then anyone feel free to chose the arrow he prefers for lateral
movements
have a nice week-end everyone
Anny

Le 28 nov. 08 à 12:14, Stefan Wöhrmann a écrit :
> Hi KJ and list,
>
> well from my point of view there is no need for any change in this
> matter. – smile –
>
> And Andrè, well during my workshops I often understand that the
> beginners support themselves with some guidelines that help them to
> learn with less insecurity. That is fine – so no problem if they
> prefer double stemmed arrows – From the teachers point of view I
> would not insist too much on this but just accept their writing
> ( if they really would write themselves that would be a tremendous
> achievement) At the same time I would follow the principles we
> know from other fields of instructions – just do not repeat what
> you yourself would judge to be wrong – but instead offer your
> “other” solution. That is the same principle as hearing babys
> learn to talk and deaf babys learn to sign. Why not accept special
> favorite options to beginners ... smile ... no problem with that.
>
> Within this context – well I have my doubts – perhaps this habit
> to vote for double stemmed arrows is connected to the teaching
> method. Often SW-instruction courses start with hands parallel to
> the wall – so all these movements up and down and circular and
> diagonal ... are associated with double stemmed movement arrows.
>
>
>
> It is always a critical point if you have to explain the writing of
> a flat hand pointing directly to the right or left – now the
> participants understand that it is up to you to see this hand from
> top down or from frontview and this will lead to the association
> that if you vote for frontview you are better of with the double
> stemmed arrow whereas the single stemmed arrows would allow only
> the exact to the right or exact to the left movement. Advanced and
> experienced scribes and readers prefer spellings with a minimum of
> “strokes” and “circles” as long as the idea can be described
> in a way that the “informed reader” understands what is to be
> performed.
>
>
>
> So no extra regulations needed – smile –
>
>
>
> Stefan ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: sw-l-bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu [mailto:sw-l-
> bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] Im Auftrag von KJ
> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 05:27
> An: SignWriting List
> Betreff: Re: [sw-l] Movement to the side
>
>
>
> I feel the same way, Stefan - I always write single stemmed arrows
> for side-to-side movement. But it is interesting what Andre had to
> say... I didn't think about connecting the single-stemmed arrows
> with floor plane handshapes and double-stemmed arrows with wall
> plane handshapes. It makes sense to me, though! And if the kids
> feel it is easier to read when the arrow stems match the handshape
> plane, then maybe we should think about adopting that as a
> convention...
>
>
>
> KJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Stefan Wöhrmann
>
> To: 'SignWriting List'
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 10:42 AM
>
> Subject: AW: [sw-l] Movement to the side
>
>
>
> Hi Andrè,
>
>
>
> I agree with Adams comment – it doesn’t matter. – smile –
> From my point of view – I prefer single stemmed arrows if the
> movement is directly to the left or right side. But this attitude
> developed over time – I guess it is a matter of clear structure .. .
>
>
>
> Sometimes I hesitate if I should vote for top – down or frontview
> if a handorientation allows both options ... and in the past we
> discussed this point that almost always both hands in a sign should
> be written – (if possible) from the same point of view ( both
> hands top down, or both hands front view) But even here I decide to
> violate this “principle” if anything seems to prevent the reader
> to understand intuitively and alost without any hesitation.
>
>
>
> So – my opinion – left and right movement – (if they are meant
> to be straight to the left and straight to the right) c a n be
> written with both arrows ( double stemmed and sinle stemmed) but in
> these cases I always vote for the single stemmed arrows.
>
>
>
>
>
> Stefan ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: sw-l-bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu [mailto:sw-l-
> bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] Im Auftrag von Gagnon et Thibeault
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 18:04
> An: SignWriting List
> Betreff: Re: [sw-l] Movement to the side
>
>
>
> Hi Adam and everyone,
>
>
>
> Yes, (A) and (B) are correct or the same. But Deaf
> students'thinking is different from your thinking. For example,
> Deaf students develop a phonological analysis for different SW
> symbols (hand on the floor or wall plane and single-stemmed arrow
> (floor plane) and double-stemmed arrow (wall plane)). Deaf
> students found that they are more comfortable to read (B) than (A)
> because of the same wall planes. It is very important for me to
> understand how to acquire and learn a phonological analysis for
> Deaf kids, not Deaf adults. For example, a Deaf kid who is 7 years
> old is able to read (B) more easy than (A) according to Deaf teacher.
>
>
>
> I don't doubt that older kids are able to read either (A) and
> (B) than younger kids.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> André
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Adam Frost
>
> To: SignWriting List
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:03 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] Movement to the side
>
>
>
> The difference between using the single stem arrow and double stem
> for side movements is just writers preference. Either is still
> correct. So (A) and (B) are the same. (C) and (D) have the hands on
> the floor plane which is different from (A) and (B). I am not
> surprise that the deaf students are talking about floor and wall
> planes. ;-)
>
>
>
> Adam
>
> On Nov 27, 2008, at 7:15 AM, "Gagnon et Thibeault"
> <atg at videotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi Val, Adam, Stefan and everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> It is interesting that Deaf students talked about a front view
>> and a top view.
>>
>>
>>
>> See my attached diagram. This is my writing (A) (DEFENDRE
>> (French) = INTERDICT (English). Deaf students are confused to
>> read it because they stopped reading and figured out it. Several
>> Deaf students explained that the two hands are parallel with the
>> front wall (front view), and the movement to the side with the
>> single-stemmed arrows is viewed from the floor (top view). They
>> suggested that the two hands are parallel with the front wall
>> (front view), and the movement to the side with the double-stemmed
>> arrows is viewed from the front wall (front view) (See the
>> attached diagram (B) because Deaf students read it easily (the
>> same front view). They told Deaf teacher if they use the two
>> hands which are parallel with the floor, they use the movement to
>> the side with the single-stemmed arrows whhich is viewed from the
>> floor (top view) (See the attached diagram (C). They don't want
>> to use (D) since they aren't conformtable to read it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I can't believe that Deaf students understand a concept of the
>> front view and the top view.
>>
>>
>>
>> I adopt Deaf students'proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> André
>>
>>
>>
>> <SW DEFENDRE.doc>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> SW-L SignWriting List
>>
>> Post Message
>> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>
>> List Archives and Help
>> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>>
>> Change Email Settings
>> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
>
>
> Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter, die bisher
> 430 Spammails entfernt und mir so eine Menge Zeit gespart hat.
> Rund 5,6 Millionen Leute nutzen SPAMfighter schon
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.11/1816 - Release Date:
> 11/27/2008 7:53 PM
>
>
> Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter, die bisher
> 433 Spammails entfernt und mir so eine Menge Zeit gespart hat.
> Rund 5,6 Millionen Leute nutzen SPAMfighter schon
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081128/fe62409a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image 2.png
Type: application/applefile
Size: 71 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081128/fe62409a/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image 2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 89151 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081128/fe62409a/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20081128/fe62409a/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list