AW: [sw-l] spelling question 30 - squeeze" motion
Ingvild Roald
iroald at HOTMAIL.COM
Tue Jan 13 11:51:47 UTC 2009
Val, Stefan and all,
thank you for your responses. I think I was a bit confused about the need to keep numbers small in print. When I thing about it, the words 'tretti' etc. are not particularlily small - but then we tend to use the arabic numerals for writing numbers for paging etc. Sometime in the future these symbols may be available along with the SW symbols, as they were in the old DOS program. For now, I will go for the two handshapes writing in a text, and for number-by-number for marking pages etc (the signs 3 and 7 rather than the sign 37). How does that sound to you?
Ingvild
From: Valerie Sutton
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 1:41 AM
To: SignWriting List
Cc: Stefan Wöhrmann
Subject: Re: AW: [sw-l] spelling question 30 - squeeze" motion
Hi Stefan!
I agree!!
No dots are the best for single squeezes. The dots were not designed for single squeezes...only for doubles and triples.
So writing the beginning and ending handshapes with no dots is definitely the easiest and the best choice.
Val ;-)
--------
On Jan 9, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Stefan Wöhrmann wrote:
Hi Valerie, Ingvild and sw-list
well from my point of view I would prefer the "easy-to-read-version" especially if you think of children, students and hearing SL-learners.
There are no "hidden" ideas behind this obvious description. An excellent support to remember the performance for this sign.
Stefan ;-)
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: sw-l-bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu [mailto:sw-l-bounces at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] Im Auftrag vonValerie Sutton
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 22:35
An: SignWriting List
Betreff: Re: [sw-l] spelling question
SignWriting List
January 9, 2009
Here are three possible writings that I might use.
In the first example, the dot is not necessary but just added
information. The second and third examples remove the first position.
The bending of the fingers holds the meaning in the sign...the bent
fingers show the "result of the squeeze" motion...so we write that
plus the arrow pulls or pushes the hand to the side...
It has taken us at least 20 years in ASL to find the best way to write
some numbers...and some of our writings are very abbreviated, and not
so easy to read for those who do not know ASL, so I understand that
you need to find a short way to write numbers, especially for tiny
page numbers etc...so for tiny page numbers I would think the third
one in this example would be the best...
Hope this has been helpful. Happy to be in discussions again!
Val ;-)
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090113/2f3e8479/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1207 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090113/2f3e8479/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list