new hand configuration - I like this one

Sat Mar 6 16:13:09 UTC 2010

I agree. The focus on the articulating finger(s) is important and easy 

Ingvild 

Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:55:09 -0800
From: chazzer3332000 at yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [sw-l] new hand configuration - I like this one
To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

This is much clearer and it focuses on the one finger that is moving, not the whole fist.

Charles

From: Valerie Sutton <sutton at signwriting.org>
To: SignWriting List <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 2:27:24 PM
Subject: Re: [sw-l] new hand configuration

SignWriting List
March 5, 2010

This is what I was attempting to do...

Please give me feedback everyone...

As you can see...the lower handshape (Adam's hand) has the thumb pushing under the middle finger...but Ramon's photo does not have the thumb underneath the middle finger...the middle finger is just going up, but the fingertip is still a part of the fist...we need to find a symbol that cannot be mis-read as another symbol...there is no other symbol like this one in the ISWA...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20100306/07a095dd/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------

____________________________________________

SW-L SignWriting List

Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/

Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l