ISWA web font

[Jonathan Duncan]

Hi Steve,

On 9/3/2014 11:21 AM, Stephen E Slevinski Jr wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> A promising emerging technology is being developed called "SVG glyphs 
> for OpenType fonts".  This will include colored and/or animated glyphs 
> in OpenType fonts.
> http://www.w3.org/community/svgopentype/
     It project seems to be at proposal stage since November 2013.
     It was supposed to be discussed in January 2014 but haven't found 
anything more about it 
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2013OctDec/0020.html)

     The only two examples I found only work in FireFox not in Chrome
     https://people.mozilla.org/~jkew/opentype-svg/GeckoEmoji.html
     https://people.mozilla.org/~jkew/opentype-svg/soccer.html

So this might still be a technology of the future.

On the page there is a link to 
http://manufacturaindependente.com/colorfont/ and 
http://manufacturaindependente.com/colorfont/workshop-lgm2012.html which 
might be quite useful for us too and works in other browsers beside 
FireFox.  We would need to implement a colorfont to work with the 
javascript.

> In theory, we can load the ISWA 2010 symbols as a 2-color font using 
> the above specification.  The resulting font file will not handle the 
> 2-dimensional placement, but it will be able to be installed on the 
> client side.  The resulting font would support the entire symbol set 
> of the ISWA 2010.
My previous post about web fonts, is similar but I had thought of doing 
the two color overlaying in CSS in a style sheet instead of the in the font.
>
> In theory, we could load the current symbol SVGs into a font that 
> would support the Unicode specification being published next year. The 
> resulting file would be 2 to 6 MB.
>
> If this worked, it would be a viable alternative to an image server 
> for SignWriting.  The 2-dimensional placement of symbols would be 
> handled with HTML and CSS on the client side.
That would be great!
Regards,
     Jonathan
>
> In particular, the Incubator project would need to be rewritten to 
> position the individual symbols rather than request a completed sign, 
> but it would save a lot of bandwidth because we wouldn't need to 
> download the SVGs for each new signs.
>
> Regards,
> -Steve
>
> ________________________________________________
>
>
> SIGNWRITING LIST INFORMATION
>
> Valerie Sutton
> SignWriting List moderator
> sutton at signwriting.org
>
> Post Messages to the SignWriting List:
> sw-l at listserv.valenciacollege.edu
>
> SignWriting List Archives & Home Page
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist
>
> Join, Leave or Change How You Receive SW List Messages
> http://listserv.valenciacollege.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SW-L&A=1
>
>

-- 

email: duncanjonathan at yahoo.ca <mailto:duncanjonathan at yahoo.ca>
joyoduncan at gmail.com <mailto:joyoduncan at gmail.com>
Cel Honduras: (504)3141-1171
Tel USA: (347)875-8442
Skype: yojoduncan

SignWriter Studio <http://www.signwriterstudio.com/>


________________________________________________


SIGNWRITING LIST INFORMATION

Valerie Sutton
SignWriting List moderator
sutton at signwriting.org

Post Messages to the SignWriting List:
sw-l at listserv.valenciacollege.edu

SignWriting List Archives & Home Page
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist

Join, Leave or Change How You Receive SW List Messages
http://listserv.valenciacollege.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SW-L&A=1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20140904/14618759/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gigdacce.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1136 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20140904/14618759/attachment.png>