[Sw-l] Placement of Signs in Space

Adam Frost icemandeaf at GMAIL.COM
Thu Apr 22 20:30:08 UTC 2021


I’m not sure about this approach of showing depth as it uses symbols for a new purpose. It came about as I was explaining the idea of sizing to show depth to another writer. The idea is that the line under the sign is longer for signs that are closer and shorter for signs that are farther. One advantage is that it is simple while staying in Front View and doesn’t have the idea of being in Top View without actually switching to it. My guess is that this would only be necessary when signs are made in depth without traveling to get into that depth, which would be simple enough to show with movement arrows.



If I recall correctly, the line under the sign has been purposed to be a way of marking proper names. By Stefan, I believe. I’ve never felt the need to include that type of information myself, but this might conflict with that idea. Hmm...


Adam

> On Apr 22, 2021, at 10:13 AM, Valerie Sutton <sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG> wrote:
> 
> SignWrting List
> April 22, 2021
> 
> Hello Adam, Andre, Cherie, Kacio, Steve, Jonathan and everyone -
> 
> Thank you for your messages and diagrams about "writing depth”. What wonderful messages you all posted, There are so many ways to write this...
> 
> And thank you Adam, for the two videos posted yesterday. They helped me a lot ;-)
> 
> As you know, the Top View can be mixed with the Front View. The Head in Top View establishes the “depth” but the rest of the sign .. the hands, the movements … can be written in the Front View, placed either near or far from the Head & body. It sounds crazy, but this combination of viewpoints seems to be working for readers.
> 
> The Front View also works with the Shoulder Line. It is clear that the second handshape is “far away” because of the Movement Arrow putting it there at the end of the movement. See diagram:
> 
> <3 Ways To Write Depth v1.jpg>
> 
> And looking at the above diagram I can see other ways to write it too. So there are a variety of choices. For me, the Movement Arrow gives me the depth information, but if you do not want to use an arrow, then the old “sizes” work very well.
> 
> Originally SignWriting was designed to keep the writing ALL Front View, using "size of symbols" to write the depth perspective of “far away”. Smaller symbols represented “far away”.
> 
> <part1.708400B8.png>
> 
> 
> This would work well with video transcription, such as Amit Moryossef’s amazing software representation of a stick figure on a video:
> 
> <Amit Moryossef.png>
> 
> https://youtu.be/pCKRWSNIaNQ <https://youtu.be/pCKRWSNIaNQ>
> 
> 
> So originally, the general “Movement Writing” system was designed without mixing viewpoints within one sign. 
> 
> I want to thank Steve Slevinski for his posting about CSS Styling strings and the fact that Steve’s styling strings make it possible in software to change the size of symbols, and thank you Steve, for SignMaker 2017 <https://signbank.org/signmaker.html>  and thank you, Jonathan, for the Quick SignEditor <https://jonathandduncan.github.io/QuickSignEditor/> programs that are implementing those styling strings right now. I am grateful for your efforts and I hope to use the size differences now to write a technical document about these issues.
> 
> I am aware of the point, that Rich Text is great for individual documents or signs that can be captured in graphics so the information is not lost, but in an actual symbolset, the information of “small” vs “large” would be lost if it is just plain text.
> 
> Nonetheless, I am glad to know I can access the smaller symbols in the two programs and I plan to use it for some demonstrations.
> 
> I have more to share later - hope you all can get up from your computers and do some exercise - it is so easy to sit for hours without realizing we need to move too!
> 
> Have a great day everyone -
> 
> Val ;-)
> 
> ________________________________________________
> 
> SIGNWRITING LIST INFORMATION
> 
> Valerie Sutton SignWriting List moderator sutton at signwriting.org <mailto:sutton at signwriting.org>
> Post Messages to the SignWriting List: sw-l at listserv.valenciacollege.edu <mailto:sw-l at listserv.valenciacollege.edu>
> SignWriting List Archives & Home Page http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist <http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist>
> Join, Leave or Change How You Receive SW List Messages http://listserv.valenciacollege.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SW-L&A=1 <http://listserv.valenciacollege.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SW-L&A=1>

________________________________________________


SIGNWRITING LIST INFORMATION

Valerie Sutton
SignWriting List moderator
sutton at signwriting.org

Post Messages to the SignWriting List:
sw-l at listserv.valenciacollege.edu

SignWriting List Archives & Home Page
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist

Join, Leave or Change How You Receive SW List Messages
http://listserv.valenciacollege.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SW-L&A=1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20210422/2e79ad12/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2021-04-22 at 1.07.23 PM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 40081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20210422/2e79ad12/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: namesign.png
Type: image/png
Size: 440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20210422/2e79ad12/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Sw-l mailing list