List of semantic features

Xiaowei Zhao xiaoweizhao at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 15:28:14 UTC 2010


Dear All,

McRae et al's have developed semantic feature norms for nouns, here is
the information, you can also download it from the accompanying
website

MCRAE K., CREE G. S., SEIDENBERG M. S., MCNORGAN C. (2005). Semantic
feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving
things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559.

Vinson and  Vigliocoo also developed norms for objects and events,
here is the information:

 Vinson D. P.,   Vigliocco G. (2008). Semantic feature production
norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research
Methods, 40, 183-190.

Hope the information is useful!

Best wishes,

Xiaowei Zhao
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Colgate University


On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Lorraine McCune <mccune at rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> For verbs a good place to start is Talmy's motion event analysis. This is
> quite robust and has solid links to early cognition.
>
> But I assume you all are aware of this. I look forward to others responses.
>
> At 08:04 AM 2/5/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We are also interested in the semantic features and specially in
>> verbs. Do anybody know a tool or something to identify words through
>> semantic features? We are working with disabled children and this list
>> could help us a lot in our work.
>>
>> We really would like to share such kind of information with you, Ben.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Teresa
>>
>> On 5 feb, 13:32, "Ambridge, Ben" <Ben.Ambri... at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:
>> > Dear all
>> >
>> > First of all, I don't know anything about this area, so please forgive
>> > me if this question is spectacularly ignorant!
>> >
>> > Does anyone know if anybody has ever attempted to produce a reasonably
>> > exhaustive list of semantic features (e.g., MOTION, CAUSE etc...) which can
>> > be "present", "absent" or "indifferent" for each of a given set of items
>> > (I'm mainly interested in verbs, but also nouns).
>> >
>> > I'm not looking for articles that debate the merits of componential
>> > analysis (with reference to only a few example features) or articles that
>> > group together verbs in terms of similar semantics (e.g., Levin, 1993) -
>> > just the longest possible list of candidate semantic features.
>> >
>> > To avoid cluttering everyone's inboxes, please reply to me directly -
>> > Ben.Ambri... at Liverpool.ac.uk<mailto:Ben.Ambri... at Liverpool.ac.uk> -  and
>> > I'll post a summary to the list.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Ben
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Info-CHILDES" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.
>
> Lorraine McCune, EdD
> Chair, Department of Educational Psychology
> Graduate School of Education
> Rutgers University
> 10 Seminary Place
> New Brunswick, NJ 08901
>
> Ph: 732-932-7496 ex. 8310
> FAX: 732932-6829
>
> Web Page: www.gse.rutgers.edu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Info-CHILDES" group.
> To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.



More information about the Info-childes mailing list