[lg policy] Examination of the impact of classifying students as English learners.

Harold Schiffman haroldfs at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 15:17:44 UTC 2019


Educators’ construction of mainstreaming policy for English learners: a
decision-making theory perspective

   - Authors
   <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10993-019-09511-6#authors>
   - Authors and affiliations
   <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10993-019-09511-6#authorsandaffiliations>


   - Linda Harklau[image: Email author] <lharklau at uga.edu>
   - Anna H. Yang


   -
      -
   <lharklau at uga.edu> <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-1971>
   -
      -


   1. 1.

Original Paper
First Online: 23 March 2019
Abstract

Increasingly across the U.S. and other industrialized democracies, teachers
take dual classroom roles as both content and English language educators.
Nevertheless, research on how educators actually understand and implement
mainstreaming language education policies at the school and district level
are sparse. This paper contributes a unique process-oriented longitudinal
perspective on how educators at the local level in one small rural U.S.
school district greeted a new mainstreaming English language education
policy. The article applies an institutional “decision-making theory”
framework that focuses on teachers as de facto local policymakers. It
considers how educators vied with one another to (re)construct a usable
history of and rationale for district language education policy that
influenced educators’ collective sense of its fairness and appropriateness.
The study also documents how teachers’ sense-making and moral judgments
regarding their own and colleagues’ professional roles and identities were
wielded in policy interpretation and implementation. Finally, the paper
examines how the mainstreaming policy continually evolved as administrators
at various levels of the school district hierarchy negotiated conflicting
goals, and as teachers in each school improvised differing professional
relationships and roles. In all, the paper finds that the meaning and form
of mainstreaming language education policies are constantly reinstantiated
by educators at the local level, and thus that local implementation of
language education policies, and what “mainstreaming” means in English
learner education, merit more careful scrutiny.
KeywordsEnglish learners New immigrant communities Mainstreaming Decision
theory Institutionalism
This is a preview of subscription content, log in
<https://link.springer.com/signup-login?previousUrl=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs10993-019-09511-6>
to
check access.
References

   1. Arkoudis, S. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and
   mainstream teachers. *Inernational Journal of Bilingual Education and
   Bilingualism,* *9*(4), 415–433.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.2167/beb337.0>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Negotiating%20the%20rough%20ground%20between%20ESL%20and%20mainstream%20teachers&author=S.%20Arkoudis&journal=Inernational%20Journal%20of%20Bilingual%20Education%20and%20Bilingualism&volume=9&issue=4&pages=415-433&publication_year=2006>
   2. Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Putting street-level organizations first: New
   directions for social policy and management research. *Journal of Public
   Administration Research and Theory,* *21*(Supplement 2), 199–201.
   https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq094.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq094>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Putting%20street-level%20organizations%20first%3A%20New%20directions%20for%20social%20policy%20and%20management%20research&author=EZ.%20Brodkin&journal=Journal%20of%20Public%20Administration%20Research%20and%20Theory&volume=21&issue=Supplement%202&pages=199-201&publication_year=2011&doi=10.1093%2Fjopart%2Fmuq094>
   3. Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past,
   present, and future. *Public Administration Review, November/December*,
   940–949.CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x>Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Reflections%20on%20street-level%20bureaucracy%3A%20Past%2C%20present%2C%20and%20future&author=EZ.%20Brodkin&journal=Public%20Administration%20Review&volume=November%2FDecember&pages=940-949&publication_year=2012>
   4. California Department of Education. (2017). English Learner Roadmap.
   https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/rm/. Accessed April 25, 2018.
   5. Callahan, R. M., & Muller, C. L. (2013). *Coming of political age:
   American schools and the civic development of immigrant youth*. New
   York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Coming%20of%20political%20age%3A%20American%20schools%20and%20the%20civic%20development%20of%20immigrant%20youth&author=RM.%20Callahan&author=CL.%20Muller&publication_year=2013>
   6. Carlson, D., & Knowles, J. E. (2016). The effect of English language
   learner reclassification on student ACT scores, high school graduation, and
   postsecondary enrollment: Regression discontinuity evidence from
Wisconsin. *Journal
   of Policy Analysis and Measurement,* *35*(3), 559–586.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21908>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20effect%20of%20English%20language%20learner%20reclassification%20on%20student%20ACT%20scores%2C%20high%20school%20graduation%2C%20and%20postsecondary%20enrollment%3A%20Regression%20discontinuity%20evidence%20from%20Wisconsin&author=D.%20Carlson&author=JE.%20Knowles&journal=Journal%20of%20Policy%20Analysis%20and%20Measurement&volume=35&issue=3&pages=559-586&publication_year=2016>
   7. Castañeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1981).Google Scholar
   <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Casta%C3%B1eda%20v.%20Pickard%2C%20648%20F.2d%20989%20%285th%20Cir.%201981%29.>
   8. Census Bureau, U. S. (2012). *The foreign-born population in the
   United States: 2010*. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20foreign-born%20population%20in%20the%20United%20States%3A%202010&author=US.%20Census%20Bureau&publication_year=2012>
   9. Cramer, S. F. (2015). *The special educator’s guide to collaboration:
   Improving relationships with co-teachers, teams, and families* (2nd
   ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20special%20educator%E2%80%99s%20guide%20to%20collaboration%3A%20Improving%20relationships%20with%20co-teachers%2C%20teams%2C%20and%20families&author=SF.%20Cramer&publication_year=2015>
   10. Creese, A. (2005). *Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual
   classrooms*. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598234>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Teacher%20collaboration%20and%20talk%20in%20multilingual%20classrooms&author=A.%20Creese&publication_year=2005>
   11. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in
   promoting educational success for language minority students. In California
   State Department of Education Office of Bilingual Bicultural Education
   (Ed.), *Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical
   framework* (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and
   Assessment Center; California State University.Google Scholar
   <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cummins%2C%20J.%20%281981%29.%20The%20role%20of%20primary%20language%20development%20in%20promoting%20educational%20success%20for%20language%20minority%20students.%20In%20California%20State%20Department%20of%20Education%20Office%20of%20Bilingual%20Bicultural%20Education%20%28Ed.%29%2C%20Schooling%20and%20language%20minority%20students%3A%20A%20theoretical%20framework%20%28pp.%203%E2%80%9349%29.%20Los%20Angeles%3A%20Evaluation%2C%20Dissemination%2C%20and%20Assessment%20Center%3B%20California%20State%20University.>
   12. Dabach, D. B. (2014). ‘I am not a shelter!’: Stigma and social
   boundaries in teachers’ accounts of students’ experience in separate
   ‘sheltered’ English learner classrooms. *Journal of Education for
   Students Placed at Risk,* *19,* 98–124.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.954044>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=%E2%80%98I%20am%20not%20a%20shelter%21%E2%80%99%3A%20Stigma%20and%20social%20boundaries%20in%20teachers%E2%80%99%20accounts%20of%20students%E2%80%99%20experience%20in%20separate%20%E2%80%98sheltered%E2%80%99%20English%20learner%20classrooms&author=DB.%20Dabach&journal=Journal%20of%20Education%20for%20Students%20Placed%20at%20Risk&volume=19&pages=98-124&publication_year=2014>
   13. Dabach, D. B. (2015). Teacher placement into immigrant English
   learner classrooms: Limiting access in comprehensive high schools. *American
   Educational Research Journal,* *52*(2), 243–274.
   https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215574725.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215574725>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Teacher%20placement%20into%20immigrant%20English%20learner%20classrooms%3A%20Limiting%20access%20in%20comprehensive%20high%20schools&author=DB.%20Dabach&journal=American%20Educational%20Research%20Journal&volume=52&issue=2&pages=243-274&publication_year=2015&doi=10.3102%2F0002831215574725>
   14. Dabach, D. B., & Callahan, R. M. (2011). Rights versus reality: The
   gap between civil rights and English learners’ high school educational
   opportunities. *Teachers College Record,* ID Number: 16558.
   www.tcrecord.org. Accessed May 25, 2017.
   15. Downey, M. (2016, January 15). Does Georgia now have a teacher
   evaluation system only a sadist could love? (2016, January 16). *Atlanta
   Journal*-*Constitution*.
   www.myajc.com/blog/get-schooled/does-georgia-now-have-teacher-evaluation-system-only-sadist-could-love/scp66NqV3Kx2N8snGqlazH/.
   Accessed May 25, 2017.
   16. Educational Testing Service. (2018). Georgia Assessments for the
   Certification of Educators. English to Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL)
   Assessment.
   https://gace.ets.org/s/pdf/gace_taag_english_to_speakers_of_other_languages_esol.pdf.
   Accessed May 1, 2018.
   17. English, B., & Varghese, M. M. (2010). Enacting language policy
   through the facilitator model in a monolingual policy context in the United
   States. In K. Menken & O. García (Eds.), *Negotiating language policies
   in schools: Educators as policymakers* (pp. 107–122). New York:
   Routledge.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Enacting%20language%20policy%20through%20the%20facilitator%20model%20in%20a%20monolingual%20policy%20context%20in%20the%20United%20States&author=B.%20English&author=MM.%20Varghese&pages=107-122&publication_year=2010>
   18. Estrada, P. (2014). English learner curricular streams in four
   middle schools: Triage in the trenches. *Urban Review.*
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0276-7.
   19. Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J.
   (2012). *The public administration theory primer* (2nd ed.). Boulder,
   CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20public%20administration%20theory%20primer&author=HG.%20Frederickson&author=KB.%20Smith&author=CW.%20Larimer&author=MJ.%20Licari&publication_year=2012>
   20. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2016). *Interactions: Collaboration skills
   for school professionals*(8th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Interactions%3A%20Collaboration%20skills%20for%20school%20professionals&author=M.%20Friend&author=L.%20Cook&publication_year=2016>
   21. Gándara, P., & Aldana, U. S. (2014). Who’s segregated now? Latinos,
   language, and the future of integrated schools. *Educational
   Administration Quarterly,* *50*(5), 735–748.
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14549957.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14549957>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Who%E2%80%99s%20segregated%20now%3F%20Latinos%2C%20language%2C%20and%20the%20future%20of%20integrated%20schools&author=P.%20G%C3%A1ndara&author=US.%20Aldana&journal=Educational%20Administration%20Quarterly&volume=50&issue=5&pages=735-748&publication_year=2014&doi=10.1177%2F0013161X14549957>
   22. García, O., & Menken, K. (2010). Stirring the onion: Educators and
   the dynamics of language education policies (looking ahead). In K. Menken &
   O. García (Eds.), *Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators
   as policymakers* (pp. 249–261). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Stirring%20the%20onion%3A%20Educators%20and%20the%20dynamics%20of%20language%20education%20policies%20%28looking%20ahead%29&author=O.%20Garc%C3%ADa&author=K.%20Menken&pages=249-261&publication_year=2010>
   23. Georgia Department of Education. (2017). Free and reduced price meal
   eligibility.
   https://oraapp.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_frl001_public.entry_form.
   Accessed May 25, 2017.
   24. GOSA. (2016). Report Card.
   https://gaawards.gosa.ga.gov/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages. Accessed May
   25, 2017.
   25. Hamann, E. T., Wortham, S., & Murillo, E. G. (Eds.). (2015). *Revisiting
   education in the New Latino Diaspora*. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Revisiting%20education%20in%20the%20New%20Latino%20Diaspora&publication_year=2015>
   26. Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2009). English language teacher
   expertise: The elephant in the room. *Language and Education,* *23*(2),
   137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152788.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152788>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=English%20language%20teacher%20expertise%3A%20The%20elephant%20in%20the%20room&author=CA.%20Harper&author=EJ.%20Jong&journal=Language%20and%20Education&volume=23&issue=2&pages=137-151&publication_year=2009&doi=10.1080%2F09500780802152788>
   27. Haworth, P. (2009). The quest for a mainstream EAL pedagogy. *Teachers
   College Record,* *111*(9), 2179–2208.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20quest%20for%20a%20mainstream%20EAL%20pedagogy&author=P.%20Haworth&journal=Teachers%20College%20Record&volume=111&issue=9&pages=2179-2208&publication_year=2009>
   28. Hill, L. E., Betts, J. R., Chavez, B., Zau, A. C., & Bachofer, K. V.
   (2014). *Pathways to fluency: Examining the link between language
   reclassification policies and student success*. Sacramento, CA: Public
   Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Pathways%20to%20fluency%3A%20Examining%20the%20link%20between%20language%20reclassification%20policies%20and%20student%20success&author=LE.%20Hill&author=JR.%20Betts&author=B.%20Chavez&author=AC.%20Zau&author=KV.%20Bachofer&publication_year=2014>
   29. Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion
   ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education
   policy and practice. *TESOL Quarterly,**41*(3), 509–532.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Slicing%20the%20onion%20ethnographically%3A%20Layers%20and%20spaces%20in%20multilingual%20language%20education%20policy%20and%20practice&author=NH.%20Hornberger&author=DC.%20Johnson&journal=TESOL%20Quarterly&volume=41&issue=3&pages=509-532&publication_year=2007>
   30. Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. *Language
   Policy,* *8,* 139–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9.
   CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Ethnography%20of%20language%20policy&author=DC.%20Johnson&journal=Language%20Policy&volume=8&pages=139-159&publication_year=2009&doi=10.1007%2Fs10993-009-9136-9>
   31. Johnson, D. C. (2013). *Language policy*. New York: Palgrave
   Macmillan.CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316202>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Language%20policy&author=DC.%20Johnson&publication_year=2013>
   32. Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical
   perspectives in language planning and policy: Situating the ethnography of
   language policy. *Journal of the Sociology of Language,* *219,* 7–21.
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0002.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Conceptual%20and%20theoretical%20perspectives%20in%20language%20planning%20and%20policy%3A%20Situating%20the%20ethnography%20of%20language%20policy&author=DC.%20Johnson&author=T.%20Ricento&journal=Journal%20of%20the%20Sociology%20of%20Language&volume=219&pages=7-21&publication_year=2013&doi=10.1515%2Fijsl-2013-0002>
   33. Kanno, Y. (2018). High-performing English learners’ limited access
   to four-year college. *Teachers College Record,* *120*(4), 1–46.Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=High-performing%20English%20learners%E2%80%99%20limited%20access%20to%20four-year%20college&author=Y.%20Kanno&journal=Teachers%20College%20Record&volume=120&issue=4&pages=1-46&publication_year=2018>
   34. Kanno, Y., & Kangas, S. E. N. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like,
   for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced
   college-preparatory courses in high school. *American Educational
   Research Journal.*  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214544716.
   35. Kochhar, R., Suro, R., & Tafoya, S. (2005). *The new Latino South:
   The context and consequences of rapid population growth*. Washington,
   DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20new%20Latino%20South%3A%20The%20context%20and%20consequences%20of%20rapid%20population%20growth&author=R.%20Kochhar&author=R.%20Suro&author=S.%20Tafoya&publication_year=2005>
   36. Krashen, S. D. (1982). *Principles and practice in second language
   acquisition*. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Principles%20and%20practice%20in%20second%20language%20acquisition&author=SD.%20Krashen&publication_year=1982>
   37. Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).Google Scholar
   <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lau%20v.%20Nichols%2C%20414%20U.S.%20563%20%281974%29.>
   38. Leung, C. (2016). English as an additional language—A geneology of
   language-in-education policies and reflections on research
trajectories. *Language
   and Education,**30*(2), 158–174.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1103260.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1103260>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=English%20as%20an%20additional%20language%E2%80%94A%20geneology%20of%20language-in-education%20policies%20and%20reflections%20on%20research%20trajectories&author=C.%20Leung&journal=Language%20and%20Education&volume=30&issue=2&pages=158-174&publication_year=2016&doi=10.1080%2F09500782.2015.1103260>
   39. Liddicoat, A. J., & Baldauf, R. B. (Eds.). (2008). *Language
   planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts*. Buffalo:
   Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Language%20planning%20and%20policy%3A%20Language%20planning%20in%20local%20contexts&publication_year=2008>
   40. Lipsky, M. (2010). *Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the
   individual in public services. 30th anniversary* (expanded ed.). New
   York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Street-level%20bureaucracy%3A%20Dilemmas%20of%20the%20individual%20in%20public%20services.%2030th%20anniversary&author=M.%20Lipsky&publication_year=2010>
   41. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). *Rediscovering institutions:
   The organizational basis of politics*. New York: Free Press.Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Rediscovering%20institutions%3A%20The%20organizational%20basis%20of%20politics&author=JG.%20March&author=JP.%20Olsen&publication_year=1989>
   42. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness.
   In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), *Oxford handbook of public
   policy* (pp. 687–706). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20logic%20of%20appropriateness&author=JG.%20March&author=JP.%20Olsen&pages=687-706&publication_year=2006>
   43. May, S. (2015). Language policy and political theory. In F. M. Hult
   & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), *Research methods in language policy and
   planning: A practical guide* (pp. 45–55). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Language%20policy%20and%20political%20theory&author=S.%20May&pages=45-55&publication_year=2015>
   44. Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). *Cops, teachers,
   counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service*. Ann Arbor:
   University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Cops%2C%20teachers%2C%20counselors%3A%20Stories%20from%20the%20front%20lines%20of%20public%20service&author=S.%20Maynard-Moody&author=M.%20Musheno&publication_year=2003>
   45. McCarty, T. L. (2011). Entry into conversation: Introducing
   ethnography and language policy. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), *ethnography
   and language policy* (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Entry%20into%20conversation%3A%20Introducing%20ethnography%20and%20language%20policy&author=TL.%20McCarty&pages=1-28&publication_year=2011>
   46. McCarty, T. L. (2015). Ethnography in language planning and policy
   research. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), *Research methods in
   language policy and planning: A practical guide* (pp. 81–93). New York:
   Wiley.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Ethnography%20in%20language%20planning%20and%20policy%20research&author=TL.%20McCarty&pages=81-93&publication_year=2015>
   47. Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Introduction. In K. Menken & O.
   García (Eds.), *Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as
   policymakers* (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855874>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Introduction&author=K.%20Menken&author=O.%20Garc%C3%ADa&pages=1-10&publication_year=2010>
   48. Menken, K., & Kleyn, T. (2010). The long-term impact of subtractive
   schooling in the educational experiences of secondary English language
   learners. *International Journal of Bilingual Education and
   Bilingualism,* *13*(4), 399–417.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903370143.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903370143>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20long-term%20impact%20of%20subtractive%20schooling%20in%20the%20educational%20experiences%20of%20secondary%20English%20language%20learners&author=K.%20Menken&author=T.%20Kleyn&journal=International%20Journal%20of%20Bilingual%20Education%20and%20Bilingualism&volume=13&issue=4&pages=399-417&publication_year=2010&doi=10.1080%2F13670050903370143>
   49. Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the
   study of education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), *The new
   institutionalism in education* (pp. 1–14). Albany, NY: State University
   of New York Press.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Institutional%20analysis%20and%20the%20study%20of%20education&author=H-D.%20Meyer&author=B.%20Rowan&pages=1-14&publication_year=2006>
   50. Meyers, M. K., & Vorsanger, S. (2003). Street-level bureaucrats and
   the implementation of public policy. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre
(Eds.), *Handbook
   of public administration*(pp. 245–255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608214.n20>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Street-level%20bureaucrats%20and%20the%20implementation%20of%20public%20policy&author=MK.%20Meyers&author=S.%20Vorsanger&pages=245-255&publication_year=2003>
   51. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (Eds.). (2001). *English as a
   second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning, and identity*.
   Reading, MA: Longman.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=English%20as%20a%20second%20language%20in%20the%20mainstream%3A%20Teaching%2C%20learning%2C%20and%20identity&publication_year=2001>
   52. Moore, S. C. K., & Wiley, T. G. (2015). Interpretive policy analysis
   for language policy. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), *Research
   methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide*. Malden, MA:
   Wiley.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Interpretive%20policy%20analysis%20for%20language%20policy&author=SCK.%20Moore&author=TG.%20Wiley&publication_year=2015>
   53. National Center for English Language Acquisition (NCELA) (2016,
   November). English Learner Tool Kit for State and Local Education Agencies
   (SEAs and LEAs). ESSA Updates Included. Washington, DC: U. S. Dept. of
   Education.Google Scholar
   <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=National%20Center%20for%20English%20Language%20Acquisition%20%28NCELA%29%20%282016%2C%20November%29.%20English%20Learner%20Tool%20Kit%20for%20State%20and%20Local%20Education%20Agencies%20%28SEAs%20and%20LEAs%29.%20ESSA%20Updates%20Included.%20Washington%2C%20DC%3A%20U.%20S.%20Dept.%20of%20Education.>
   54. NCES. (2017). Public High School Graduation Rates.
   https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_coi.asp. Accessed May 25,
   2017.
   55. Powers, J. M. (2014). From segregation to school finance: The legal
   context for language rights in the United States. *Review of Research in
   Education*.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x13506550.
   56. Reeves, J. (2010). Looking again at add-on ESOL certification. *TESOL
   Quarterly,* *44*(2), 354–364.  https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.222216.
   CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.222216>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Looking%20again%20at%20add-on%20ESOL%20certification&author=J.%20Reeves&journal=TESOL%20Quarterly&volume=44&issue=2&pages=354-364&publication_year=2010&doi=10.5054%2Ftq.2010.222216>
   57. Ricento, T. (2006). *An introduction to language policy: Theory and
   method*. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=An%20introduction%20to%20language%20policy%3A%20Theory%20and%20method&author=T.%20Ricento&publication_year=2006>
   58. Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion:
   Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. *TESOL Quarterly,*
    *30*(3), 401–427.CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.2307/3587691>Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Unpeeling%20the%20onion%3A%20Language%20planning%20and%20policy%20and%20the%20ELT%20professional&author=T.%20Ricento&author=NH.%20Hornberger&journal=TESOL%20Quarterly&volume=30&issue=3&pages=401-427&publication_year=1996>
   59. Rong, X. L., & Hilburn, J. (2017). *Immigration and education in
   North Carolina: The challenges and responses in a new gateway state*.
   Boston: Sense Publishers.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-809-9>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Immigration%20and%20education%20in%20North%20Carolina%3A%20The%20challenges%20and%20responses%20in%20a%20new%20gateway%20state&author=XL.%20Rong&author=J.%20Hilburn&publication_year=2017>
   60. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for
   qualitative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), *Handbook
   of qualitative research*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Three%20epistemological%20stances%20for%20qualitative%20inquiry&author=TA.%20Schwandt&publication_year=2000>
   61. Short, D. J. (1999). Integrating language and content for effective
   sheltered instruction programs. In C. J. Faltis & P. Wolfe (Eds.), *So
   much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism, and ESL in the secondary
school* (pp.
   105–137). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Integrating%20language%20and%20content%20for%20effective%20sheltered%20instruction%20programs&author=DJ.%20Short&pages=105-137&publication_year=1999>
   62. Stephens, C., & Johnson, D. C. (2015). ‘Good teaching for all
   students?’: Sheltered instruction programming in Washington state language
   policy. *Language and Education,* *29*(1), 31–45.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.924965.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.924965>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=%E2%80%98Good%20teaching%20for%20all%20students%3F%E2%80%99%3A%20Sheltered%20instruction%20programming%20in%20Washington%20state%20language%20policy&author=C.%20Stephens&author=DC.%20Johnson&journal=Language%20and%20Education&volume=29&issue=1&pages=31-45&publication_year=2015&doi=10.1080%2F09500782.2014.924965>
   63. Thompson, K. D. (2013). Is separate always equal? A philosophical
   examination of ideas of equality in key cases regarding racial and
   linguistic minorities in education. *American Educational Research
   Journal,* *50*(6), 1249–1278.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213502519.
   CrossRef <https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213502519>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Is%20separate%20always%20equal%3F%20A%20philosophical%20examination%20of%20ideas%20of%20equality%20in%20key%20cases%20regarding%20racial%20and%20linguistic%20minorities%20in%20education&author=KD.%20Thompson&journal=American%20Educational%20Research%20Journal&volume=50&issue=6&pages=1249-1278&publication_year=2013&doi=10.3102%2F0002831213502519>
   64. Umansky, I. M. (2016). To be or not to be EL: Examination of the
   impact of classifying students as English learners. *Educational
   Evaluation and Policy Analysis,* *38*(4), 714–737.
   https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716664802.CrossRef
   <https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716664802>Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=To%20be%20or%20not%20to%20be%20EL%3A%20Examination%20of%20the%20impact%20of%20classifying%20students%20as%20English%20learners&author=IM.%20Umansky&journal=Educational%20Evaluation%20and%20Policy%20Analysis&volume=38&issue=4&pages=714-737&publication_year=2016&doi=10.3102%2F0162373716664802>
   65. U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Consolidated state performance
   report: Parts I and II, school year 2015–2016 for Georgia.
   https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/sy15-16part1/ga.pdf.
   66. U.S. Department of Education. Office of Elementary and Secondary
   Education (2016, September 23). Non-Regulatory Guidance: English Learners
   and Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as
   amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Washington, DC: U.S.
   Department of Education.Google Scholar
   <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=U.S.%20Department%20of%20Education.%20Office%20of%20Elementary%20and%20Secondary%20Education%20%282016%2C%20September%2023%29.%20Non-Regulatory%20Guidance%3A%20English%20Learners%20and%20Title%20III%20of%20the%20Elementary%20and%20Secondary%20Education%20Act%20%28ESEA%29%2C%20as%20amended%20by%20the%20Every%20Student%20Succeeds%20Act%20%28ESSA%29.%20Washington%2C%20DC%3A%20U.S.%20Department%20of%20Education.>
   67. Valdés, G. (2001). *Learning and not learning English: Latino
   students in American schools*. New York: Teachers College Press.Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Learning%20and%20not%20learning%20English%3A%20Latino%20students%20in%20American%20schools&author=G.%20Vald%C3%A9s&publication_year=2001>
   68. Wagenaar, H. (2011). *Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue
   in policy analysis*. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Meaning%20in%20action%3A%20Interpretation%20and%20dialogue%20in%20policy%20analysis&author=H.%20Wagenaar&publication_year=2011>
   69. WIDA Consortium. (2014). *Annual Report 2014*. Madison, WI:
   Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Google Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Annual%20Report%202014&publication_year=2014>
   70. Yanow, D. (2000). *Conducting interpretive policy analysis*.
   Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
<https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983747>Google
   Scholar
   <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Conducting%20interpretive%20policy%20analysis&author=D.%20Yanow&publication_year=2000>

Copyright information
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019
About this article
CrossMark
<https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007%2Fs10993-019-09511-6>
Cite this article as:Harklau, L. & Yang, A.H. Lang Policy (2019). https:

-- 
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

 Harold F. Schiffman

Professor Emeritus of
 Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305

Phone:  (215) 898-7475
Fax:  (215) 573-2138

Email:  haroldfs at gmail.com
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/

-------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20190325/8fdd4233/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list