29.1244, Confs: Cognitive Science, General Linguistics, Linguistic Theories, Semantics, Syntax/Germany

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Tue Mar 20 21:59:21 UTC 2018


LINGUIST List: Vol-29-1244. Tue Mar 20 2018. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 29.1244, Confs: Cognitive Science, General Linguistics, Linguistic Theories, Semantics, Syntax/Germany

Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté,
                                   Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Kenneth Steimel <ken at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:58:53
From: Johanna Poppek [poppek at linguistics.rub.de]
Subject: The Count-Mass Distinction: A Linguistic Misunderstanding?

 
The Count-Mass Distinction: A Linguistic Misunderstanding? 

Date: 07-May-2018 - 09-May-2018 
Location: Bochum, Germany 
Contact: Johanna Marie Poppek 
Contact Email: poppek at linguistics.rub.de 
Meeting URL: http://count-and-mass.org/becl2018/ 

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; General Linguistics; Linguistic Theories; Semantics; Syntax 

Meeting Description: 

Numerous publications bear witness that the count/mass distinction is a
prominent topic in linguistic research. Despite its prominence, the
distinction is elusive, and several key issues have not yet been resolved. 
Many linguists and philosophers have some intuitive idea of a count/mass
distinction, but formal theories eventually have to map their count/mass
distinction to another arbitrary property.  Lost in this process is the
possibility that a binary distinction may be observationally and descriptively
inadequate.

On the semantic side, some authors presuppose that count nouns make atomic
denotations available in language (cf. Link 1983; Chierchia 1998, 2000;
Rothstein 2010). Some of these approaches have been challenged by the
homogeneous structure of count nouns like fence and wall. Additionally there
are the so-called fake mass nouns, object mass nouns or superordinates such as
furniture, silverware or lingerie that provide denotations with an atomic
structure but unlike count nouns they do not make their atoms available in
language. Even though Rothstein (2010) manages to solve these problems by
introducing contextually related atomicity, it remains unclear what the very
concepts count and mass mean apart from making atomic structure available. In
Rothstein’s approach, the burden is shifted to a contextual function, which,
however, seems to be present in every usage of at least some nouns. 
While the aforementioned approaches are based on compositional semantic
analyses, syntactic approaches such as Borer’s 2005 treatment of plurals as
divisions have shed new light on interesting areas, but fail to integrate
compositionality. A peculiar puzzle for the role of number in syntax and
semantics is the fact that ‘mass’ nouns sometimes can denote pluralic
entities, but require singular number agreement in many languages. This
observation has severe implications for approaches as diverse as the
Minimalist Program (Chomsky 2005) and HPSG (Pollard and Sag 1994) – both
approaches assume that number is an interpretable feature.
The uncertainty around the count/mass distinction is further exacerbated by
the observation that a binary distinction may not be able to account for the
full range of data. Although Allan (1980) has already shown that nouns do not
necessarily occur in all contexts that are usually labeled syntactically as
‘count’ or ‘mass’, the variation among nouns has been ignored with the
exception of so-called dual life nouns, i.e. nouns that are both count and
mass. Recent empirical research by Kiss et al. (2016) has put this issue on
the fore again, by pointing out nouns that may be pluralized, but may not
occur together with an indefinite determiner (e.g. additive, disadvantage,
therapy and punishment), and also nouns that may occur together with an
indefinite determiner, but may not be pluralized (blush, bosom and front). 
Similar problems emerge if immediate grammatical consequences of a count/mass
distinction are considered. Many grammarians assume e.g. that singular count
nouns require the presence of a determiner; but a closer look into the
literature reveals that the relationship between determiners and nouns is
either one of stipulation (if not circularity), or even reversed, so that we
could instead conclude that determiners of a certain type need ‘count’ nouns
as their complement, but not that the nouns actually require the presence of a
determiner (as e.g. in Chierchia 1998). 
Finally, broader typological research has shown that the count/mass
distinction is not a necessary property of the grammar system (cf. Wiltschko
2012, Mathieu 2012, Lima 2014, 2016). 
The purpose of this conference is to critically examine what we know about the
count/mass distinction, and ideally to provide ideas and evidence that puts
research on the count/mass distinction on a new level – even if this means
that the count/mass distinction is replaced by alternative concepts (cf. CfP
for details).
 

Program: 

The Count-Mass Distinction - A Linguistic Misunderstanding?
CALM 2018

May 7-9, 2018 
Bochum, Germany

http://count-and-mass.org/becl2018/

Registration Deadline: April 15, 2018

Invited Speakers: 

Gennaro Chierchia Harvard University, USA
Jenny Doetjes Universiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
Susan Rothstein Bar-Ilan University, Israel

Discussants:

Hagit Borer Queen Mary University of London
F. Jeffry Pelletier University of Alberta

Monday May 7, 2018

9:15 - 10:00:
Registration & Welcome
Welcome address by Prof. Dr. Axel Schoelmerich, Rector Ruhr-Universitaet
Bochum

10:00 - 10:45: 
Alan Bale (Concordia University): 
Number marking and the mass/count distinction

10:45 - 11:00: Coffee Break

11:00 - 11:45:
Scott Grimm (University of Rochester): 
Determining Countability Classes

11:45 - 12:30:
Hanna de Vries (University of York), George Tsoulas (University of York), 
Raffaella Folli (Ulster University), Agata Renans (Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum),
Jacopo Romoli (Ulster University):
'Exoskeletal iceberg semantics': a best-of-both-worlds approach to the
mass/count distinction

12:30 - 14:00: Lunch Break

14:00 - 15:30:
Gennaro Chierchia (Harvard University): 
Where do we stand with the mass and count distinction?

15:30 - 16:00: Coffee Break

16:00 - 16:45:
Byeong-uk Yi (University of Toronto): 
The Mereological Approach to the Mass/Count Distinction: Critical Remarks

16:45 - 17:30:
Sandeep Prasada (Hunter College):
The formal dimension of common sense concepts and the count-mass distinction

17:30 - 18:15:
Brendan S. Gillon (McGill University): 
Underspecification and the mass count distinction

Tuesday May 8, 2018:

9:15 - 10:00:
Peter R. Sutton (Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf), Hana Filip
(Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf): 
Coercion: container, contents and measure readings

10:00 - 10:45:
Christine Hnout (Bar-Ilan University), Lior Laks (Bar-Ilan University), Susan
Rothstein (Bar-Ilan University): 
Mass to count shifts in the Galilee dialect of Palestinian Arabic

10:45 - 11:00: Coffee Break

11:00 - 11:45:
El Mustapha Lemghari (Cadi Ayyad University): 
Mass and Count Terms: Towards a Hybrid Sub-category

11:45 - 12:30:
Tibor Kiss (Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum), F. Jeffry Pelletier (University of
Alberta), Halima Husic (Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum), Johanna Marie Poppek
(Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum): 
Countability and Polysemy

12:30 - 14:00: Lunch Break

14:00 - 15:30:
Susan Rothstein (Bar Ilan University):
Counting and plurality

15:30 - 16:00: Coffee Break

16:00 - 16:45:
Chiara Zanini (University of Zuerich), Giorgio Arcara (San Camillo Hospital,
Venice, Italy), Francesca Franzon (SISSA): 
The role of the context in countability: a psycholinguistic approach

16:45 - 17:30:
Peter Lauwers (Ghent University): 
Mass-like categories in lexical plurals. A gradual view on the mass/count
distinction

17:30 - 18:15:
Francesca Franzon (SISSA, University of Padova), Chiara Zanini (University of
Padova, University of Zuerich), D. Addison Smith (University of Trento),
Raffaella Bernardi (University of Trento), Sandro Pezzelle (University of
Trento): 
An exploration of visual cues related to countability: two computer vision
experiments

Conference Dinner at Yamas Bochum

Wednesday May 9, 2018:

9:15 - 10:00:
Kayron Bevilaqua (Universidade Federal do Parana), Roberta Pires de Oliveira
(Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Universidade Federal do Parana,
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnoligico):
What do Bare Nouns mean cross-linguistically? Preliminary results

10:00 - 10:45:
Helen Koulidobrova (Central Connecticut State University):
Counting (on) Bare Nouns:Revelations from ASL

10:45- 11:00: Coffee Break

11:00- 11:45:
Christopher Hicks (University of Manchester):
Marking and acquisition of individuation: English and Mandarin compared

11:45- 12:30:
Kurt Erbach (Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf), Hana Filip
(Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf), Peter R. Sutton
(Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf), Kathrin Byrdeck
(Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf):
Object Mass Nouns as an Arbiter for the Mass/Count Category

12:30 - 14:00: Lunch Break

14:00 - 15:30:
Jenny Doetjes (Universiteit Leiden): 
Count/mass asymmetries

15:30 - 16:00: Coffee Break

16:00 - 16:45:
Myriam Dali (University of Ottawa), Eric Mathieu (University of Ottawa):
Distributed number and the mass/count distinction

16:45 - 17:30:
David Nicolas (Institut Jean Nicod, ENS, EHESS, PSL, CNRS): 
Matter and mixtures





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
            http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-29-1244	
----------------------------------------------------------
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
          http://multitree.org/







More information about the LINGUIST mailing list