Analogs of Vysotsky - IV

Sentinel76 Astrakhan thysentinel at HOTMAIL.COM
Mon Feb 10 21:22:03 UTC 2014


Hello, again.

I would vote for Dylan. One of the original criticisms against this was that Dylan only spoke to the American intelligentsia while Vysotsky's influence was more universal in the USSR. That may be true (although others in this list have written about Dylan's broad influence, with which I agree), but it could be argued that they were both speaking to the same audience. This depends on the definition of "intelligentsia," but if that term is defined broadly as those who are socially and politically conscious, then Vysotsky spoke to the same people. The only difference is that there were many more Soviet citizens into that category than Americans. 
 
I disagree.  An intellectual is an intellectual, and a bum in the street is a bum in the street.  Vysotsky appealed to factory workers, miners, truck drivers, cops, and prisoners in a way that Dylan did not.  I maintain that Cash and especially Marley appealed to these (huge) segments of the society substantially more than Dylan.
 
I don't think anyone could possibly have had the same influence in America that Vysotsky did in the USSR.  
 
Elvis.  If only he wrote better poetry, Americans would have them their own Vysotsky.  Heck, Lennon came close.
 
Attention is pulled in too many different directions over here (but it's fun to hear everyone argue for their favorites!). I don't mean this as an insult, but there's a reason why there are 8-10 American/British artists on that list and only one Soviet. 


That's just not true.  I can bring up Okudzhava, BG, Shevchuk, and Tsoy who are not far behind Cash, Dylan, and Cobain in terms of their impact (if at all).  And, speaking of arguing their favorites:
But the most appropriate comparison is actually Eddie Vedder and Pearl Jam. You clearly let your personal tastes carry you away.  PJ's appeal was even briefer than Nirvana's.  "Massively popular" is a massive overstatement.
So, I would argue, in terms of his lasting fame, Vysotsky's acting should be considered.  In terms of lasting fame -- absolutely.  But, like I said:  his main two roles had largely a posthumous effect.    But I still believe that there can not possibly be an American /Western equivalent of Vladimir Vysonsky. To truly see his uniqueness we have to look at the context (the Soviet state, the time of stagnation) and recall that Vysotsky was a voice of non-conformity, subversion and protest. None of the American or any Western singers/poets/bards had to deal with anything comparable to the Soviet censorship.  Bob Marley.  In fact, Marley went to far greater distances in "protest" than any of the people we've discussed so far, including Vysotsky. Vysotsky, btw, was never an open "protester."  He never wrote a song like Marley's "Get up, Stand up."  He never called out for the open protest and was never an open dissident.  All his songs were ultimately about himself, in various (often imaginary) scenarios.  He was the ultimate lone wolf.  Power of One, personified. Vysotsky’s topics and images were truly unique. Just recall his songs “The One Who did not Shoot” (tot, kotoryi ne strelial), Penal Batallions (Shtrafnye batal’ony), Bathhouse (Ban’ka).  They were unique, but these are not the best examples.  For example, one can, without too much stress, imagine "The One Who Didn't Shoot," being written not only by Alexander Galich, but also by Bob Dylan.  I cannot imagine anybody writing "Wolfhunt," "The Ornery Horses," "The Monument," or "History of Illness," that's for sure. I am still struggling with Marley.  I have listened to several songs of his last night.  He has a totally different vibe from Vysotsky.  He does have a strong message and his words are very resonant, but so far I haven't heard any notable storytelling.  And Vysotsky was, first and foremost, a terrific storyteller.  Marley's words don't seem to carry much of intellectual stimulation, like those of Vysotsky, Dylan, and Cohen.  Plus Marley just sounds too laid back, ya'know?  Vysotsky was all about intensity and attack. As far as Marley's appeal / impact goes, it seems that I underestimated his popularity.  From talking to different people, it seems like he currently rivals, and possibly surpasses Morrison.  Again, we are talking US/UK, because in the Third World Marley beats everyone into pulp.  But even in America you will not find many kids, of all races and statutes, who would not have heard of Marley. The only aspect that I don't see anybody rivaling Vysotsky, in the West or in the East, is his intensity and sheer domination.  In the world of thrash metal, maybe (think James Hetfield of Metallica and Phil Anselmo of Pantera), but they are fairly low in the category of "universal listenability" :). Vadim 		 	   		  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
  options, and more.  Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
                        http://seelangs.wix.com/seelangs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/seelang/attachments/20140210/14420f61/attachment.html>


More information about the SEELANG mailing list