Rgraczyk at aol.com
Tue Nov 30 20:42:01 UTC 2004
In a message dated 11/30/2004 10:48:27 AM Mountain Standard Time,
John.Koontz at colorado.edu writes:
I think Crow c^i is usually from *ki, right? So then this suggests
something like *kira-, which would make sense for the first syllable.
Yes, c^ could be from *ki, although it could also correspond to Hidatsa ts,
which I believe reflects PS *s.
My initial instinct with xc^i/xta is that it looks a lot like the xti/xta
'true, very' enclitic in MVS, etc. I'm don't recall if that occurs in
Crow-Hidatsa. But I would expect something like -ta or -tu - can't
remember how *t comes out before *u! - for *-taN or *-tuN. And then maybe
-a for *-he? So, for *kyetVNh-e something like *c^ilata(a) or *c^ilatua?
I don't see how to work the xt/xc^, even with simplification elsewhere.
Too bad it's not ht/hc^! Then some kind of metathesis might be
Crow doesn't have anything like the xti/xta 'true, very' enclitic. *tuN
would come out as s^u in Crow.
Note, however, that the notes to the CSD entry talk about the hawk stem
maybe involving several roots compounded together.
That is a possibility. c^i- corresponds to one of the many ki's (dative,
etc.) in MVS. c^i-laxchi could mean something like 'wrap up one's own', or
'one's own wrapped up or bound'. (c^i- would be a possessive reflexive prefix
here.) But that analysis doesn't make much sense to me semantically for a bird
term, and it think it is worthwhile to at least pursue the notion that
c^ilaxchi' is a basic stem rather than a composite stem.
Would issa- be from *ikta- or *ihta-? I think the *kira- probably fits
better, but obviously this isn't impossible either.
Yes, issa- could be from *ikta- or *ihta.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Siouan