WHEEL.bair.uh? (was "wheel barrels?")
Dennis R. Preston
preston at MSU.EDU
Thu Aug 12 11:29:50 UTC 2004
I don't deny that there are plenty of nonstandard speakers (as I
prefaced all my remarks identifying) who do not l-vocalize. I think
I was even sympathetic. Perhaps I should have continued to say "in
those dialects which l-vocalize" in front of every assertion. Guess
it seemed unnecessary.
dInIs
>I deny Dennis Preston's major premise, "salva caritate" that is!
>
>What happens in cases where "barrel" and "barrow" don't fall together? You
>can't deny the existence of something that exists for millions of people
>just because it doesn't exist for you. Why not also deny the existence of
>other people themselves because even if they argue they exist because they
>think or for whatever other reason, that's not existence for you. Does
>"dInIs" exist in name or in person?
>
>T.M.P.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dennis R. Preston" <preston at MSU.EDU>
>To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 5:06 PM
>Subject: Re: WHEEL.bair.uh? (was "wheel barrels?")
>
>
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail
>header -----------------------
>> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster: "Dennis R. Preston" <preston at MSU.EDU>
>> Subject: Re: WHEEL.bair.uh? (was "wheel barrels?")
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>>
>> Tom is wrong. As I showed in my previous post, after 'barrel' and
>> 'barrow' fall together, there is absolutely nothing to keep one from
>> being heard as the other (with the exception of the lexical frequency
>> and familiarity facts larry has touched on and which I happily
>> concede).
>>
>> On the second point, I believe I showed this "lapse" (sigh!) specifically.
>>
>> dInIs
>>
>>
>>
>> >1. I don't think ease of pronunciation has anything to do with the
>> >barrow/barrel confusion; it may have more to do with how the words are
>heard
>> >spoken. Also, whereas "barrel" is heard as "barrow" by me and lots of
>> >English users from my linguistic background (no questions allowed about
>this
>> >murky issue please!) the reverse doesn't seem possible, i.e, "barrow" is
>not
>> >heard as "barrel."
>> >
>> >2. Incidentally, the variant pronunciation of "barrow" as (BAIR.uh, in my
>> >transcription) given in dictionaries compiled in the mid-1900's (Kenyon &
>> >Knott, 1953, probably influenced by Webster's Third, 1961) -- how common
>is
>> >it in current North American English? Does everyone say a compound word
>such
>> >as "wheel barrow" as (WHEEL.bair.oh) all the time or, esp. in rapid
>> >conversational style, lapse into (WHEEL.bair.uh)?
>> >
>> >TOM
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Laurence Horn" <laurence.horn at YALE.EDU>
>> >To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:17 AM
>> >Subject: Re: wheel barrels?
>> >
>> >
>> >> ---------------------- Information from the mail
>> >header -----------------------
>> >> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> >> Poster: Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at YALE.EDU>
>> >> Subject: Re: wheel barrels?
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>> >-----
>> >>
>> >> At 10:41 AM -0400 8/11/04, Thomas Paikeday wrote:
>> >> >Bethany,
>> >> >
>> >> >FWIW, here is my explanation of why you hear "wheel barrow" as "wheel
>> >> >barrel":
>> >> >
>> >> >The "l" sound in that position is rounded, so is "w". The "-ow"/"-el"
>> >> >confusion, I believe, is borne out in similar phonetic contexts
>including
>> >> >"-al", "-il", "-ol", -"ul", and "-yl" if someone will supply examples
>in
>> >> >support of or against this claim by a non-phonetician.
>> >> >
>> >> >TOM PAIKEDAY
>> >> >www.paikeday.net
>> >>
>> >> Tom, I'm not sure I buy this, however persuasive the phonetic
>> >argumentation.
>> >>
>> >> My wife purchased a wheelbarrow earlier this summer and since then
>> >> has referred to it consistently as a wheelbarrel. (This surprised me
>> >> because she's from Greenwich, CT and doesn't have all that many
> > >> "folk" pronunciations in her dialect.) I just checked and she
>> >> confirmed that she (like others who have commented) would always
>> >> *spell* it as "wheelbarrow" but usually *pronounces* it as
>> >> wheelbarrel. She claims (essentially like Tom) that it's "easier to
>> >> say" as 'barrel", but when I grilled her on whether she'd say "bow
>> >> and arrel" because it's easier than saying "bow and arrow", she
>> >> acknowledged she'd be extremely unlikely to do so. So I think the
>> >> folk etymological link with "barrel" is crucial in the former case,
>> >> whatever the phonetic motivation.
>> >>
>> >> Larry
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dennis R. Preston
>> University Distinguished Professor
>> Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic,
>> Asian and African Languages
>> Wells Hall A-740
>> Michigan State University
>> East Lansing, MI 48824-1027 USA
>> Office: (517) 353-0740
>> Fax: (517) 432-2736
--
Dennis R. Preston
University Distinguished Professor of Linguistics
Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic, Asian, and African Languages
A-740 Wells Hall
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824
Phone: (517) 432-3099
Fax: (517) 432-2736
preston at msu.edu
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list