# Number Words & Number Systems - Answer to Laurent Sagart

Ross Clark r.clark at AUCKLAND.AC.NZ
Tue Apr 24 00:24:50 UTC 2007

```Some additional difficulties in identifying the numeral element in Vanuatu with *RaCep:

- *R in Vanuatu languages is reflected as either /r/ or zero. The initial consonant of the numeral element is /r/ only in the languages of Espiritu Santo. Elsewhere (Banks, Malekula, Ambrym, Efate) it's /l/.

- The form of the innovative numerals seems to have been *lima + *l/rave + N (where N = 1,2,3,4). Many languages have reduced this by dropping the *lima (e.g. Mota lavea-rua '7'), but it can be seen in its full form in, e.g. Tolomako lina-rave-rua, Banam Bay ma-ruv-ru '7'.
In the word for '6', some Santo languages have dropped the '1', so Wusi lima-rave '6', rave-rua '7', Mafea m"a-rav"e '6', rav"e-rua '7'.
So it looks as if the meaning of the middle element is something like 'plus' rather than 'hand'.

Ross Clark

________________________________

From: an-lang-bounces at anu.edu.au [mailto:an-lang-bounces at anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Richard Parker
Sent: Monday, 23 April 2007 3:00 a.m.
To: an-lang at anu.edu.au
Subject: [An-lang] Number Words & Number Systems - Answer to Laurent Sagart

(Oops)
(...after a period of competition between *RaCep and *lima, *lima finally
won out, displacing RaCep. It would be strange if *RaCep suddenly resurfaced
in the Pacific: the total absence of reflexes of *RaCep between Taiwan and Vanuatu
would be hard to explain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it certainly would, wouldn't it? But, if *RaCep didn't start in Taiwan,
but just ended up there, it wouldn´t be so difficult to explain.

It wouldn't be difficult to explain if the entire Western MP area was swamped
(quite recently, within the last 2 millenia, by languages originating from the Orang Laut, Badjau, Sri Vijayans, and other sea-going traders).

I've already pointed out the parallel with Pasismanua (New Britain) -sip,
but there are others (not very many, it has to be said):

'bacin marahin sib' is 5 in Wampur, a North New Guinea (Morobe Prov) An language.
'bacin marahin' is the 'hand word' as in 'bacin marahin bisangcwa'=6= 'b-m-1'.
(How you can possibly derive 'bacin marahin bisangcwa' from PAn *enem
is quite another matter)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I really wasn't trying to prove anything when I started on this project.
I had always assumed that Austronesian, like Proto-Indo-European, was born
with a fully-formed symbolic decimal numbering system.

One of the most impressive things about the language family was that much the
same word meant 5 and hand from Madagascar to Easter Island, and Taiwan to
New Zealand - half a world apart.

I knew about a very few primitive numbering name/systems in Taiwan, and just one
in Luzon, but then I glanced at http://www.zompist.com/numbers.htm and found there
were scores of 'primitive' numbering systems roughly east of the Wallace Line.

So I decided to investigate them.

I've found nearly 170 An languages where counting up to 5 is relatively simple,
but from 5-9 is more primitive, as the 'add 1,2,3,4' system, in Rukai, or
even something else altogether, like Saisiyat, but not the plain, simple and
very memorable *enem, *pitu, *walu, *Siwa of PAn.

It shouldn't be logically possible for anyone to 'retreat' to a more primitive
numbering system if his language has already been handed a very simple and
easily memorable symbolic numbering/name system, by their Taiwan immigrant
language-founders.

The very obvious answer is that Austronesian settlers in New Guinea, etc, adopted
the number morphemes and systems of their Papuan neighbours, for trade and tribute
purposes.

So I added in every Papuan neighbour of those Austronesian speakers, and it simply
isn't so.

Papuan number morphemes just don't match their neighbour An ones, but, occasionally,
at first glance, the local numbering systems do. (This still needs a closer study to see if
it's absolutely and consistently true).

In some places, Papuan-speakers (and don't forget we are talking about 8 different
language phylae) are quite out-numbered by An speakers, as in Timor and Flores.
They have adopted An number morphemes for 1-5, or parts of that system, but not a
lot elsewhere.

So what are we left with ?

1) The numbering systems and phonemes have been adopted from, or adjusted to, to
their local neighbours - not completely so.

2) Simple number symbols came from PAn in Taiwan and 'regressed'? Really?

3) Local groups changed over entirely to speaking An, but kept to their
ancestral number systems?

4) The 'aberrant' number systems (and, by association, the languages)
evolved in just the places where they're still found.

regards
Richard Parker
Siargao Island, The Philippines.
My website at www.coconutstudio.com is about the island and its people, coastal early humans, fishing, coconuts, bananas and whatever took my fancy at the time.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/an-lang/attachments/20070424/df91db81/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
An-lang mailing list
An-lang at anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/an-lang
```