More on pidgins descended from ergative languages
David Robertson
drobert at TINCAN.TINCAN.ORG
Mon Mar 15 16:24:44 UTC 1999
LhaXayEm,
Thanks to Manny and Sally for very thought-provoking messages.
So is there a pidgin, or creole, anywhere in the world that has (had)
ergativity in its grammar?
I'm somewhat familiar with several different p/c languages, and haven't
seen a trace of ergativity myself either.
With many other linguists, I am inclined to see p/c genesis as a potential
ontogenetic mirror for the phylogeny of human language(s). Thus it would
be of much interest to see that these languages consistently exhibit a
certain (accusative-nominative) grammar to the exclusion of ergative-
absolutive grammar.
I would guess, then, that accusativity is "less marked" universally than
ergativity -- frequent though the latter is in the world's languages.
We have good descriptions of many p/c languages, so we know to a great
extent what these languages *are*. It may be illuminating to conduct the
thought experiment: What are they *not*?
Cheers,
Dave
*VISIT the archives of the CHINOOK jargon and the SALISHAN & neighboring*
<=== languages lists, on the Web! ===>
http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/salishan.html
http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/chinook.html
More information about the Chinook
mailing list