[gothic-l] Re: is þar sind correct as they are?

[Dicentis a roellingua@gmail.com [gothic-l]]

Yes Johann, you confirm what I thought. An admin of the Gothic wiki told me
that thar ist for existence is fine, but I disagreed with him because I
can't find that in the Gothic Bible. But is it possible that "ist" is taken
over from the original Greek and there is for existence is used in other
early Germanic languages?

Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft Johann Dröge anheropl0x at gmail.com [gothic-l] <
gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Oscar is a fucking idiot.
>
>
> Back to the topic, not making up fake words and claiming others should
"take lessons"...
>
> I just use ïst or sind. Your example is a little bit difficult to do
directly, but I might write it as:
> Manna waurkjands/a ïst.
>
> But! If you are actually trying to point out his/her/their location
(There is a working man, as opposed to here is a working man) then þar or
jainar can be used. But in English, the phrase "there is/are" can be used
to simply state the existence of something, without referring to any actual
location.
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I studied Braunes grammar and Wrights book and I read a lot in the
Gothic bible, and you tell me to take lessons lol, where did you read that
nonsense of sindamma.
>>
>> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >
>> >
>> > you should have taken lessons dude......
>> >
>> > On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:31 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > No, they are is "sind". Where in the bible or Skeireind is sindamma
attested?
>> >
>> > Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> they are dude......
>> >>
>> >> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:12 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sindamma? What's that supposed to mean?
>> >>
>> >> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> sindamma would be better....
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:35 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I always use "sind" or "ist", someone told me however that þar ist
or þar sind can be used as meaning there is or there are too, like:
>> >>> There is a man which works.
>> >>>
>> >>> But where is this attested except for in modern Germanic languages,
and isn't it better to use what the Bible uses?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>
>
> --
> Glaðliga ríða Noregs męnn til Hildar þings.
>
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20150301/8cd1b7dd/attachment.htm>