Non-IE roots in Germanic/@, a, e, i, j, o, u
Larry Trask
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Tue Mar 9 11:13:18 UTC 1999
- Previous message (by thread): Non-IE roots in Germanic/@, a, e, i, j, o, u
- Next message (by thread): Non-IE roots in Germanic/@, a, e, i, j, o, u
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal wrote:
[on Basque <haizkora> from Latin <asciola>]
> Might the word not have been borrowed directly as <aizkola>, with
> metathesis of the /i/ (especially if Latin <sci> already had a
> degree of allophonic palatalization)? That, or analogy with the
> other tool words in (h)ai(t)z-.
All of these things are possible, and the contamination view has been
put forward. The direct-borrowing view has not been favored, because we
know of no good parallel, while the sporadic change of /a/ to /ai/ in a
first syllable is well documented.
Larry Trask
COGS
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH
UK
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Previous message (by thread): Non-IE roots in Germanic/@, a, e, i, j, o, u
- Next message (by thread): Non-IE roots in Germanic/@, a, e, i, j, o, u
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list