[Lingtyp] Verbs of success with dative subject
Hannu Tommola
hannu.tommola at uta.fi
Fri Jan 4 06:42:46 UTC 2019
Hi,
Hasn't anybody mentioned Finnish?
There are the alternatives with a canonical (a) and a non-canonical
(b) subject:
'we/Jussi succeeded in everything'
(a) me/Jussi onnistuimme/onnistui kaike-ssa
1PL/Jussi succeed.PST.1PL/3SG all-INES
(b) mei-lle/Jussi-lle onnistui kaikki
1PL/Jussi-ALL succeed.PST.3SG all
In the corresponding construction with a verbal complement the
non-canonicial subject is in the genitive:
'we succeeded in doing it'
(a) me onnistu-i-mme teke-mä-än se-n
1PL succeed-PST-1PL do-3INF-ILL it-GEN(ACC)
(b) meidä-n onnistu-i teh-dä se
we-GEN succeed-PST do-INF it
Happy new year and success to all,
Hannu
Quoting Jussi Ylikoski <jussi.ylikoski at oulu.fi>:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Here is a non-IE example from North Saami (Uralic), disregarding
> the probable influence from its Scandinavian neighbors. ILL stands
> for the illative, the case for Direction and Recipient, which could
> be (and earlier has been) labeled "dative" as well:
>
>
>
> Midjiide/Johanii lihkostuvai buot.
>
> 1PL.ILL/Johan.ILL succeed.PST.3SG all
>
> 'We/Johan succeeded in everything.'
>
> (cf. Norwegian /Alt lykkes for oss/Johan/.)
>
>
>
> Unlike in Scandinavian, a dummy subject usually does not occur:
>
>
>
> Midjiide/Johanii ii lihkostuvvan oažžut oktavuođa duinna.
>
> 1PL.ILL/Johan.ILL NEG.3SG succeed.PST.PTCP get.INF contact.ACC 2SG.ACC
>
> 'We/Johan didn't succeed in contacting you.'
>
> (cf. Norwegian /Det lyktes ikke for oss/Johan å ta kontakt med deg/.)
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Jussi
Hannu Tommola
Professor emer. of Russian Language (Translation Theory and Practice)
School of Language, Translation and Literary Studies
FIN-33014 University of Tampere, Finland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20190104/41cb2562/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list