16.3072, Review: 2nd Lang Acqn/Applied Ling: Ellis&Barkhuizen(2005)

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3072. Tue Oct 25 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.3072, Review: 2nd Lang Acqn/Applied Ling: Ellis&Barkhuizen(2005)

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Lindsay Butler <lindsay at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

What follows is a review or discussion note contributed to our 
Book Discussion Forum. We expect discussions to be informal and 
interactive; and the author of the book discussed is cordially 
invited to join in. If you are interested in leading a book 
discussion, look for books announced on LINGUIST as "available 
for review." Then contact Sheila Dooley at dooley at linguistlist.org. 

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 22-Oct-2005
From: Yasemin Kirkgoz < ykirkgoz at yahoo.com >
Subject: Analysing Learner Language 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 02:28:02
From: Yasemin Kirkgoz < ykirkgoz at yahoo.com >
Subject: Analysing Learner Language 
 

AUTHORS: Ellis, Rod; Barkhuizen, Gary
TITLE: Analysing Learner Language
SERIES: Oxford Applied Linguistics
PUBLISHER: Oxford University Press
YEAR: 2005
Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/16/16-1482.html 

Yasemin Kirkgoz, Department of ELT, Lecturer in English Language Teaching 
at the University of Çukurova

OVERVIEW

This comprehensive book written by well-known academician Rod Ellis and 
researcher Gary Barkhuizen "Analyzing Learner Language" makes a 
significant contribution to the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) 
by exploring the multidimensional nature of SLA.  The book is introduced 
by a preface, which lays out the background and the aim of the book, and 
consists of fifteen chapters.  Chapter One is an introduction. Chapter Two 
provides a general description of different methods employed for 
collecting data from L2 learners.  Chapters three through thirteen, focus 
on one particular method of data collection and analysis organized neatly 
into four sections, following the same format.  While the first section of 
each chapter introduces the historical and theoretical background of the 
method, the second section illustrates application of the method to actual 
data.  This is followed by an example of a study that has employed the 
method. The last section sets up a task to give readers hands-on 
experience in analysing a sample of learner language. Each chapter 
concludes with a final comment highlighting the main points discussed. 
Chapter fourteen, written by Michael Barlow, examines computer-based 
analyses of learner language, a relatively new development in SLA, and 
finally chapter fifteen summarizes the entire book. 

DESCRIPTION

In the introductory chapter, "Introduction" Rod Ellis and Gary Barkhuizen 
start with providing an overview of published works on SLA and research 
methodology. Given an abundance of literature on this field of enquiry, 
they explain the motivation for writing this book as to offer a new 
dimension to analyzing learner language, reiterating the main aim of the 
book, already stated in the preface, as to overview theoretical and 
research contexts for the different methods of data collection and 
analysis, introduce a variety of methods for analyzing learner language, 
and to provide the readers with opportunities of data-based tasks so that 
they can experience of applying different methods of analysis, 
themselves.  Learner data employed throughout the book is the empirical 
data based on the authors' experiences of teaching SLA to postgraduate 
students in different teaching contexts.  Then, the chapter gives an 
explanation of two key terms, extensively used throughout the book: 'SLA' 
and 'learner language', distinguishing two senses of SLA.  'SLA' is used 
here to refer to the study of how people learn a second language while 'L2 
acquisition' refers to the learning of another language after acquisition 
of one's mother tongue is complete (p.3).  Learner language comprises the 
oral or written language produced by learners serving as the primary data 
for the study of L2 acquisition (p4).  The chapter concludes by outlining 
the main differences in the research paradigms widely recognized in the 
social sciences as 'normative' and 'interpretative' chosen from Cohen and 
Manion (1994) and the 'critical researcher' from Norman (1994), pointing 
out that much of the SLA research is of the mixed form, for example a 
researcher adopting a normative design but employing a qualitative method 
of data collection. Reference is made to subsequent chapters illustrating 
these three research paradigms and employing the type of data analysis 
method, qualitative or quantitative.

Chapter Two "Collecting Samples of Learner Language" focuses on different 
methods of data collection from L2 learners.  The three sets of data 
identified include non-linguistic performance data, such as non-verbal 
measures of learners' comprehension of linguistic input so that inferences 
can be made about learners' linguistic knowledge, samples of learner 
language (oral and written), which the authors contend as constituting the 
primary data for investigating L2 acquisition, and reports from learners 
about their own learning.  Three principal methods of data collection are 
distinguished: obtaining samples of 'naturally occurring' language use, 
i.e., language produced in a real-life situation (a conversation around 
the dinner table), eliciting data, either clinically or experimentally 
elicited data, which can be obtained through the use of specially designed 
instruments, and verbal reports for example 'self-report' and 'self-
observation'.  'Construct validity' is the key theme emphasized throughout 
the chapter.  The authors encourage us to employ multiple types of data to 
attain construct validity given that no single method will provide a 
completely valid picture of what a learner knows.  The chapter ends by 
stressing the necessity of obtaining the permission of the participants 
while collecting the data.

Chapter Three, "Error Analysis" deals with procedures used for identifying 
and describing learners' errors.  The authors begin with highlighting the 
significance of learner errors, and move on to surveying the history of 
Error analysis (EA) from the prescriptive grammarians of the 18th century 
to Contrastive analysis of 1960's.  The behaviorism view of considering 
language learning as a process of habit formation is contrasted with 
nativist theories, emphasising the mental processes of the mind during the 
process of learning a language. The reader is introduced to the 
term 'interlanguage' coined by Selinker (1972), referring to mental 
grammar constructed by a learner at a specific stage in the learning 
process (p.54).  The central premises of this theory are explained, 
admitting that though these premises continue to be disputed, many of the 
arguments receive support by the findings of EA. In the next section, the 
authors outline a five-step procedure of conducting an error analysis, 
noting that errors can be explained either as 'interlingual' errors, 
resulting from mother tongue influences or 'intralingual' errors, 
resulting from the operation of learning strategies. At the end of the 
chapter, the reader is given an error analysis task based on a letter 
written by a Japanese student. In the final comment, while the authors 
acknowledge that studying learner error has practical significance to 
language pedagogy, they remind us of the limitations of EA as not offering 
complete information on learner language. 

Chapter Four "Obligatory Occasion Analysis" deals with analyzing samples 
of learner language in order to examine the order of acquisition, and 
determine how accurately learners use specific linguistic forms.  The 
chapter starts with an overview of the development of this analysis, which 
is initially used to investigate first language (L1) acquisition in 
longitudinal studies, and cross-sectional studies with reference to some 
research studies.  This procedure was then adopted by SLA researchers in 
both longitudinal and cross-sectional "morpheme studies" to see whether 
there was a universal 'order of acquisition'.  This is followed by 
introducing the procedure for conducting an Obligatory Occasion Analysis, 
together with how this procedure can be applied in cross-sectional studies 
to determine the order of acquisition. Having given an example of a study 
using this procedure, the reader is assigned a task based on 
transcriptions of oral narratives produced by five learners.  As in the 
previous chapter, authors point out the benefits of using this analysis at 
the same time indicating its limitation: by explaining whether or not 
learners have acquired L2 forms, it does not contribute much to the actual 
processes involved in L2 acquisition. 

Chapter Five "Frequency Analysis" begins with a definition of frequency 
analysis, discussing its advantages: 1) it avoids 'comparative fallacy' by 
examining learner language in its own not in terms of whether they 
correspond to target language forms; 2) it captures the gradual and 
dynamic nature of interlanguage development (p.93).  In the historical and 
theoretical background of frequency analysis, also referred to as 
interlanguage analysis, an overview of the need for frequency analysis is 
given, mainly due to investigating variability in learner language since 
the nature of learner errors varies from occasion to occasion, and for 
describing the sequence of language acquisition.  The authors then mention 
problems associated with it, such as being a longitudinal study, it is 
time-consuming and the necessity to know how to operationalise 'stage of 
acquisition'. Having offered a detailed description of how to conduct a 
frequency analysis, an example of a study using this methodological tool 
is given. The chapter ends with a task to the reader, based on negative 
utterances produced by a Portuguese learner of English as L2.  A final 
comment by the authors rightly shows the need that frequency analysis be 
seen not as an alternative to but rather as complementary to obligatory 
occasion analysis. 

Unlike chapters three to five which dealt mainly with the grammatical 
aspects of learner language, Chapter Six entitled "Functional Analysis" 
examines functional analyses of learner language to investigate how 
learners meet their communicative needs by using their linguistic 
knowledge. The authors first distinguish two types of functional analysis 
as a 'form-function analysis' in which the starting point of analysis is a 
specific linguistic form such as plural -s or verb -ing, from which 
follows investigating the specific meanings, and 'function-form analysis' 
where the starting point is a language function, i.e., referring to future 
events then identifying the linguistic form in a sample of learner 
language, both types of analyses being complementary.  The history of the 
study of learner language is considered as a progression from formal 
analysis (as investigated in Chapters three through five) to form-function 
analyses, and then to function-form analysis.  In the account of form-
function analysis, the authors, referring to earlier morpheme and 
longitudinal studies, show why these approaches failed to take into 
account the functional properties, and introduce studies that viewed 
learners' language 'as dynamic' consisting of a system of form-function 
mappings showing learners' interlanguage development, and that who 
provided evidence of form-function mapping in learner language.  In the 
second half of this section, function-form analysis is examined drawing on 
the work in pragmatics. This section concludes with an evaluation of 
functional approach pointing out some of its limitations.  Steps to be 
followed in a form-function and function-form analysis are given, followed 
by an example of a study using a functional analysis.  The chapter 
concludes with a task, based on a role-play task between an American 
native-speaker of English and a Taiwanese non-speaker speaker.

Chapter Seven "Analysing Accuracy, Complexity and Fluency" deals with 
measuring these three aspects of language based on studies of tasks.  The 
chapter starts with defining these concepts explaining briefly the methods 
developed to measure them.  Then, a review of the studies based on the 
analysis of learner language in terms of these three constructs within an 
information-processing model is given, with a focus on investigating how 
learners' performance is affected by the nature of the tasks.  The next 
section examines the various measures used to study accuracy, complexity 
and fluency by conducting analyses of two oral texts based on a study of 
the effects of pre-task and on-line planning of oral narratives produced 
by Chinese university students. Having illustrated an example of a study 
involving these aspects of language, the reader is given a task based on 
two samples of oral learner language to compare in terms of these 
measures.  The authors make final comment by pointing out two problems 
involved; reliability and multiplicity of the measures used, offering 
useful suggestions as to how to address them.

Chapter Eight "Interactional Analysis" starts with defining discourse and 
interactional analysis.  In a brief review of the history of the 
interactional analysis in SLA, three aspects of interaction are discussed: the 
negotiation of meaning, communication strategies and error treatment. 
Then, an outline of conducting an interactional analysis is given, 
offering a general guideline for analysing problem-solving interactions of 
interlocutors when confronted with a particular problem using the data 
from a communicative task performed by two Korean undergraduate students. 
An example of a study of interactional analysis is followed by an 
interactional analysis task based on several short interactions taking 
place in various communicative tasks. In the final comment, the authors 
try to demonstrate the value of interactional analysis as 
providing 'internal view of language pedagogy' (194).

Chapter Nine "Conversation Analysis" is concerned with analyzing all forms 
of spoken interaction, such as in classroom or courtroom, in order to 
provide a turn-by-turn description of what participants do in these 
conversations (p. 197).  The section on historical and theoretical 
background gives an excellent review of conversation analysis, 
illustrating the three types of organization comprising 'turn-
taking', 'sequence organization' and 'repair' based on short extracts. In 
the next section, five criteria proposed by Markee (2000) illustrating a 
conversation analyst oriented methodology for a social interactionist 
approach to SLA studies is given reflecting the main theoretical and 
methodological principles of conversation analysts. A set of guidelines of 
conducting a conversation analysis is followed by a more analytic tool for 
conducting conversation analysis, which is illustrated with extracts from 
published sources. An appendix given at the end of the chapter illustrates 
all symbols used in the extracts in the chapter.

Chapter Ten "Sociocultural Methods of Analysis" addresses sociocultural 
theory in the study of L2 learning, that is, with particular emphasis on 
collaborative learning in the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).  Then, 
some of the key constructs in sociocultural theory, particularly as they 
relate to L2 development, many of which are associated with Russian 
developmental psychologist, Lev Vygotsky, with a focus on his research, 
are outlined.  A set of guidelines is provided for undertaking a 
sociocultural analysis of learner language data, offering assisted 
performance and the ZDP, from the perspective of Vygotsky. Then, the 
procedure of conducting a qualitative microgenetic analysis of mediated 
learning within ZPD is illustrated in three sections: selecting relevant 
episodes for analysis, determining patterns of interaction, and 
determining microgenetic growth.  A task is set up involving an analysis 
of scaffolded interactions based on episodes of a transcript of classroom 
interactions, and the chapter ends with the authors' final comments.

Chapter Eleven "Coding Data Qualitatively" examines how to code 
qualitative data within the paradigm of interpretative qualitative 
research. The chapter begins with a definition of 'qualitative data' as 
comprising the data collected through methods such as observation, open-
ended interviews, field notes, etc., and 'coding' as the technique used to 
organize data into themes. In the theoretical overview, the authors first 
introduce various labels being assigned to different qualitative research 
traditions such as 'ethnographic', 'naturalistic' or 'case study', with 
reference to studies undertaken in this research paradigm, giving advice 
to researchers to choose the methods to analyse and interpret data that 
will most appropriately answer the research question. Additionally, a 
distinction is made between deductive and inductive orientations to 
qualitative research. While in the former the researcher begins with a set 
of hypotheses or research questions trying to prove them, in the latter 
the researcher begins with the data, and through analysing it searches for 
salient themes to arrive at an understanding of the phenomenon. Then, the 
process used in coding qualitative data is illustrated, followed by an 
example of an ethnographic academic listening to illustrate qualitative 
data collection and analysis methods. Finally, a task is set up 
illustrating open coding practices. 

Chapter Twelve "Critical Approaches to Analyzing Learner Language" is 
concerned with language, identity and power relations, introducing a 
*critical* perspective to analysing learner language. Starting with a 
discussion of the question "what makes a perspective critical?" (p. 278), 
to which the authors admit that no easy answer is given due to the varying 
and sometimes conflicting views offered by critical theory. An overview of 
critical approaches in SLA first starts with highlighting the role 
critical analysis plays in SLA by making the notion of power central, 
raising questions such as who has or who does not have the power?, how do 
power relations affect language learning?. The section continues with a 
discussion on classroom interaction analysis, social identity theory and 
identity and discourse, and ends by noting some of the criticisms raised 
against critical approaches to text analysis. Useful suggestions are 
offered to a critical analyst engaged in conducting an analysis of learner 
language text.  A longitudinal, ethnographic study of the English learning 
of four Chinese-speaking immigrant students in California is given to 
illustrate the interrelationship between discourse and power in the social 
environment of each language learner. Based on an interview extract, the 
reader is asked to consider questions of identity, textual features and 
discourse in the analysis. In the final comment made by the authors, we 
are reminded that critical analyses require a very demanding 
interpretative and explanatory work, involving a lot of difficult 
interpretation requiring a high level of responsibility.

Chapter Thirteen "Metaphor Analysis" explores the identification and 
interpretation of the metaphors in learner self-report data to understand 
learners' conceptualization of the language and the process of learning.  
Starting with the traditional view to metaphor, the chapter draws on 
several studies to illustrate how metaphor analysis has become an 
acceptable tool in the applied linguistic enquiry and how it has gained 
popularity in SLA, giving examples from the popular SLA metaphors 
i.e., 'mind-as-computer', 'learner as problem solver'. In the next 
section, a detailed analysis of conducting a metaphor is given, 
distinguishing between a 'linguistic metaphor', and the 'conceptual 
metaphor', and two types of data for performing a metaphor analysis is 
introduced: experimentally elicited metaphors and clinically elicited 
samples of learner language, detailing the strengths and weaknesses of 
metaphor analysis.  Later, the six-step procedure for analyzing the 
metaphors in learner self-report is given, of which the first three steps 
are illustrated.  An important part of this chapter is an example of 
metaphor analysis based on a study by Ellis (2002) reporting an analysis 
of the diaries kept by an ab initio learner of L2 German.  The reader's 
task involves applying metaphor analysis to data from a Japanese learner's 
autobiographical accounts of her English language learning experience, in 
order to identify how this learner conceptualizes the problems she 
experienced in learning L2 and the solutions to those problems.  The 
chapter concludes with a summary.

Chapter Fourteen: "Computer-based Analyses of Learner Language".  This 
chapter by Michael Barlow, looks at SLA from a different perspective, from 
the analysis of learner corpora, "digital representations of the 
performance or output, typically written language of learners" (p. 335).  
Barlow states the underlying reason in compiling learner corpora as to 
identify, describe and explain errors, making a link to error analysis 
described in chapter 3.  The chapter first examines the design criteria 
and compilation of learner corpora, noting that all corpora must be well 
designed and the data concerning learner variables need to be well 
documented.  Data collection for learner corpus involves the sampling of 
language production, both spoken and written, and storing the data for 
each learner in database with an ID number. An alternative way to encode 
variables is suggested as tags or annotations within the corpus itself.  
Then, Barlow gives examples of best-known collection of learner corpora, 
illustrating error-tagging of a learner corpus, that is, an annotation 
added to the corpus to explicitly mark an error, and then he discusses the 
difficulty of this process.  Barlow notes that research on learner corpora 
to some extent follows some of the general aims associated with 
contrastive analysis, such as, making NS/NNS comparison. He then 
distinguishes two methodologies related to learner corpus investigation: 
1) to use learner corpus data for hypotheses-testing (hypothesis-driven 
approach) about the nature of interlanguage generated through SLA theories 
or experimental data; 
2) to investigate learner corpora data in a more exploratory manner and 
initiate analyses that yield patterns of data, which can then be 
investigated for unusual features (hypothesis-finding approach).  

In the third section, a detailed illustration of the application of corpus 
analysis software through a learner corpus is given, including the word 
frequency list and searching for a particular word through concordance 
analysis.  Many variations on word counts are illustrated, such as 
identifying the most common sentence-initial words in different learner 
corpora. The reader's task based on analyzing a learner corpus is followed 
by a final comment in which Barlow rightly contends that learner corpora 
provides a rich source of data which may be used to eliminate the problems 
experienced in errors analysis.

Chapter Fifteen "Conclusion" is the final chapter that discusses different 
conceptions of what it means to acquire an L2 and how they are related to 
the variety of methods of analysis, based on the major distinction made 
throughout the book, which is: learner language is seen as evidence of L2 
acquisition and learner language is seen as a source of information about 
the factors influencing L2 learning.  The chapter begins with the issue of 
learner language as evidence of L2 acquisition.  Ellis & Barkhuizen argue 
that learner language constitutes the primary data for the study of L2 
acquisition, referring to Chapter 2.  They then identify two kinds of 
norms: external and internal norms underlying the different methods of 
analysis.  In the case of conceptions based on external norms 'native-
speaker norms' serve as the point of comparison with learner language, 
acquisition being measured in terms of the extent to which learners employ 
target language forms.  They discuss the problems associated with this 
norm and point out that there is clearly a need to examine learners' 
interlanguages in terms of their internal norms to properly understand the 
dynamic aspects of interlanguage development.  They offer clarification to 
some of the terms discussed by SLA researchers, such as differences 
between 'L2 competence' and 'L2 proficiency', 'L2 use' and 'L2 
acquisition', highlighting the role of 'construct validity', 'learner 
language' with reference to previous chapters. Final comment raises the 
issue of demonstrating 'reliability' or 'dependability' no matter what the 
matter of analysis is employed.

CRITICAL EVALUATION

"Analysing Learner Language" is a notable book offering an up-to-date 
introduction to the major key issues in SLA research and bringing together 
a significant amount of research studies conducted in this field of 
enquiry. Each chapter is clearly laid-out and well written, with excellent 
end-of-chapter summaries. Perhaps, the most positive quality of this book 
is that the authors first introduce the historical and theoretical 
discussion of the methods investigated, second present the method 
illustrating each method's application to actual empirical data, and 
finally give readers a practical experience to try out each method for 
themselves.  

Another welcome contribution of this book is that throughout the text, the 
authors present sample of data of each method from different teaching 
contexts based on their teaching experiences, giving the reader a much 
wider perspective on L2 learners' acquisition.  Since authors do not 
preach one particular method, but attempt to provide an overview of the 
strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, they encourage researchers 
to critically choose the method(s) that would best suit the situation they 
find themselves in and of research questions addressed.  

Each chapter deals with a different method thus most chapters are well 
worth the time it takes to read. The content is certainly not easy to 
read, since it is presented in a very dense and factual manner. This is 
certainly not criticism, as it is entirely appropriate for a book of this 
quality.

Overall, I would highly recommend this book to those involved in SLA 
research as well as postgraduate students. Teachers could certainly 
benefit greatly from the data analysis section of different methods and 
carry out the tasks given. The wealth of examples, the detail of 
discussion makes this book an extremely useful reference for those 
involved in SLA studies.


REFERENCES

Cohen, L. & L. Manion. 1994. Research Methods in Education; Fourth 
Edition. London: Routledge. 

Ellis, R. 2002. 'A metaphorical analysis of learner beliefs' in P. 
Burmeister, T. Piske and A. Rohde (eds.): An Integrated View of Langauge 
Development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode.  Trier, Germany: 
Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

Markee, N. 2000. Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Selinker, L. 1972. 'Interlanguage.' International Review of Applied 
Linguistics 10:209-31. 

ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Yasemin Kirkgoz is an Assistant Professor in the Department of English 
Language Teaching at the University of Çukurova, Turkey. Her research 
interests include second language acquisition, corpus analysis of learner 
language and classroom-based research.





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3072