LL-L 'Etymology' 2007.02.02 (07) [E]
Lowlands-L List
lowlands.list at GMAIL.COM
Sat Feb 3 00:46:28 UTC 2007
=======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands.list at gmail.com
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.php
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org - lowlands.list at gmail.com
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
Administration: lowlands.list at gmail.com or sassisch at yahoo.com
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L - 02 February 2007 - Volume 07
========================================================================
From: Kevin and Cheryl Caldwell <kevin.caldwell1963 at verizon.net>
Subject: LL-L 'Etymology' 2007.02.02 (03) [E]
> From: Jonny Meibohm <altkehdinger at freenet.de>
> Subject: LL-L 'Etymology'
> Who knows what's the true etymological origin of 'does'? We have nothing
comparable, neither in German 'er, sie es
> _tut_' nor in LS: 'hey, sey, dat (et) _deiht_'. Here we have it in the 2nd
person pres. sing.: 'du tu/-s-/t', LS 'du
> deih/-s-/t'.
> (Making some more thoughts I see of course this E: -s or -es in all verbs
3rd person presence sing. vs. in G and LS > always in the 2nd.)
In early Modern English (late 16th, early 17th centuries, as in Shakespeare
or the King James Bible), 3rd person singular was -th/-eth (he goeth, doth,
hath, runneth...), while 2nd person singular was -st/est (thou goest, dost,
hast, runnest...). I don't know where the -s/-es ending came from in Modern
English, or when.
Kevin Caldwell
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l")
are to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
*********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lowlands-l/attachments/20070202/f78de47b/attachment.htm>
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list