[sw-l] Dictionary entries versus everyday signing...
sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG
Sun Jan 23 16:17:25 UTC 2005
January 23, 2005
Kasterlinden Bilinguaal wrote:
> (for Shane) here is lovely Kathleen ;) I agree with you that native
> signs should not just be changed because it is signed that way in
> another country. If I talk about 'Ireland' I use the Flemish word
> 'Ierland' and not the Irish 'Eire'. It is ofcourse very enriching to
> know both, your own native sign + the sign of the country itself :o)
Actually in a way, I believe you all may have misunderstood my point.
Of course you cannot force anyone to sign one way or the other...that
would be against my personal morals. I believe in freedom one hundred
Meanwhile, we were talking about a dictionary entry. As you know, if
you look up a word in an English dictionary, you will oftentimes find
several definitions for the same word, and several alternative words to
choose from...So dictionaries are sources of information...they show
you what choices are available within the accepted norms of the
That is why, here in the US, we started to add two dictionary entries
for the names of each country...the old ASL sign, and then the sign
that is used in the country itself. That way, when someone looks up the
sign in the dictionary, they can see the different signs side by
side...and that is informative...
So dictionary work is not exactly the same as speaking and signing and
even teaching signing...Dictionaries have lots of words that we don't
use on a daily basis, but it is a good reference tool...
So when Lucy asked why Stefan chose to put the Polish sign for Poland
in the German dictionary, I was trying to explain that maybe he wanted
to have the Polish sign there, as well as other signs for
More information about the Sw-l