[sw-l] SW Dos Dictionary to SignPuddle?

[pennersw at YBB.NE.JP]

Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info, and for your incredible program.
We definitely don't want the graphic only option, since we are eagerly
anticipating the use of the look-up feature in the future, and our Dos
dictionary is not so huge that it will be a problem re-inputting it into
SignPuddle. Will it be possible to transfer from SignPuddle 1 to
SignPuddle 2? Or should we hold off on inputting until SP2 is ready?

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> [mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] On Behalf Of
> Steve Slevinski
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:56 PM
> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] SW Dos Dictionary to SignPuddle?
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> SW Dos and SignPuddle use different symbol sets. SW Dos used
> SSS-95. SignPuddle uses the latest version of the IMWA.
>
> If you can find the way to create graphic files from a SW Dos
> dictionary, I can load the signs into the dictionary as
> graphics only. These signs can be used in the email and
> translation screen, but graphics only will not work with SignMaker.
>
> -Steve
>
> Penner Mark wrote:
>
> > Quick question--is there a way to get signs from our SW DOS
> dictionary
> > to SignPuddle without writing them all over again? In
> reading through
> > posts from last November, I thought I saw a way to do that with
> > SignBank, but I've not found it on SignPuddle yet. Mark
> >
>