SignWriting in Unicode update...
Steve Slevinski
slevin at SIGNPUDDLE.NET
Tue Jun 15 20:37:14 UTC 2010
Hi List,
I've been having a fun time chatting on the Unicode Email list. I think
I have a plan that may get SignWriting added to Unicode sooner rather
than later.
My plan breaks down into two steps. The first is to write a proposal to
encode all of the ISWA 2010 symbols with 674 code points. The proposal
will need to show there is a sizable community of users. It will need
to prove the stability of the symbol set. It will need to define and
justify all of the symbols to encode.
The proposal will need to pass through two committees. It may be quick
and easy. It may get mired in revisions and rewrites for years. I'm
not sure what to expect.
No small feat, but it is focused and has a reasonable chance of success.
I'd prefer that we were able to hire professionals to write the proposal
for us, but unless someone knows something I don't, this proposal will
be written by volunteers. Probably myself. I will be creating a new
version of the ISWA HTML Reference specifically for the proposal.
This proposal will not include any of the structure or layout characters
needed to actually write sign language. That will be covered by the
second part of the plan: a Unicode Technical Note for the lightweight
markup I am calling the "SignWriting Cartesian Markup".
There are two reasons to use a markup for layout. The first is that
Unicode has already rejected layouts in the past, specifically western
musical notation. The second is that Unicode would need to be convinced
that the layout style proposed was the best choice. There is no reason
to confuse the symbol proposal with a layout proposal.
Upon reflection, it makes sense to wait to encode the layout. With only
the symbols encoded, we can apply different layout styles. We could try
polar coordinates of angle and distance. We could try a tree structure
where symbols relate to other symbols, rather than the center of the
sign. We could try a style with predetermined symbol placement rather
than give the writer precise control over symbol location.
I have already started the research needed to write the proposal. I
will only be spending a small percentage of my time on the proposal at
first. I'm hoping to have a proposal ready to review later this year
with an official submission before the end of the year.
Life is fun, eh?
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20100615/fc460ed7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list