Dakota cognate??
Rory M Larson
rlarson at unlnotes.unl.edu
Mon Mar 15 21:58:38 UTC 2010
Bob - Yes, it's s^ukka. You should be able to see the slip via the link
Catherine included.
I just looked up optaye in Riggs. It's the Dakota word for a flock of
birds, a herd of animals, or a company of people. Dorsey has included it
here because it matches the Omaha word in meaning, not because it is
cognate.
Justin - Omaha has the word s^uga meaning 'thick' too. That would be
cognate to your s^óga. Can we make any sense out of those names
translating s^ókka as 'flock'/'herd'/'company'?
Rory
"Justin McBride" <jmcbride at kawnation.com>
Sent by: owner-siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU
03/15/2010 04:05 PM
Please respond to
siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU
To
<siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU>
cc
Subject
Re: Dakota cognate??
I can't speak for Dakotan, Catherine, but to answer Bob's question, JOD
does
have a few KS entries that may be either cognate or at least somewhat
related. In his personal names slips, he lists the female name Cú-ka mí
[s^ókka miN] and the male name Cu-ká-mi [s^okkámiN], but offers only an
unhelpful translation of the former, 'Cu-ka female.' In his dictionary
slip
file, there's also cú-ga [s^óga], which he defines as 'thick; dense.' I
can't say for sure why KS would voice a stop that OP doesn't, though, so
maybe that last one's not related after all, but the semantics seem to
match
up.
-jtm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rankin, Robert L" <rankin at ku.edu>
To: <siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: Dakota cognate??
No way. But I've discovered that what Dorsey has at the bottom of many of
his slips are not cognates in our technical sense of the word. They
should
probably be called something like "equivalents". For the other 3 or 4
Dhegiha languages he almost always gives real cognates, and they're
usually
nearly identical. Once he gets outside Dhegiha, all bets are off. He
gives
a cognate if one was obvious to him, but otherwise he may just give some
term with a similar meaning.
Is the O-P form "cuka" that you give here Dorsey's transcription? In
other
words, is this [s^uka] or is it [c^uka], with a "ch" sound? If it's "ch"
then I'm wondering what a cognate in the other languages might look like.
"Ch" generally doesn't occur before /u/, so I'm just curious. Does he
give
Osage, Kansa or Quapaw cognates for it?
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU on behalf of Catherine Rudin
Sent: Mon 3/15/2010 2:59 PM
To: siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU
Subject: Dakota cognate??
Hi, guys -- I'm just entering some information from Dorsey slips for the
Omaha and Ponca dictionary and ran across an odd-looking cognate. Does it
make sense for optaye to be Dakota cognate for O-P cuka?
Catherine
here's a link to the slip image
http://omahalanguage.unl.edu/dictionary_images/ck/opd.01.088.08c.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/siouan/attachments/20100315/de29788e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Siouan
mailing list